Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522969›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

The ISHLT chronic lung allograft dysfunction consensus criteria are applicable to pulmonary chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Yifan Pang, Ananth V Charya, Michael B Keller, Arlene Sirajuddin, Yi-Ping Fu, Noa G Holtzman, Steven Z Pavletic, Sean Agbor-Enoh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00092235 (Natural History Study of Clinical and Biological Factors Determining Outcomes in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00092235 recruitingnot on this map

Natural History Study of Clinical and Biological Factors Determining Outcomes in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2004Enrolled650ConditionsChronic Graft vs. Host Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yifan PangNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.ORCID 0000-0002-8934-8251
Ananth V CharyaPulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-1515
Michael B KellerCritical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Arlene SirajuddinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Yi-Ping FuOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Noa G HoltzmanImmune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0002-5706-1109
Steven Z PavleticImmune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and.
Sean Agbor-EnohDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

NIH Chronic GVHD Study GroupZIABC011743 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI PAVLETIC, STEVEN · 2016 to 2025
$10.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary chronic graft-versus-host disease (PcGVHD) is a devastating complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT). The 2014 National Institutes of Health cGVHD consensus criteria (NIH criteria) only captures bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). In this study, we adapted the 2019 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) to define novel phenotypes of PcGVHD and compared the performance of this criteria with the NIH criteria to identify patients with high-risk PcGVHD. We reviewed consecutive patients in a cGVHD natural history protocol (#NCT00092235) and adapted the 2019 CLAD criteria (the adapted criteria) to define PcGVHD as post-HCT forced expiratory volume at 1 second < 80% predicted value, with 4 phenotypes: obstructive, restrictive, mixed obstructive/restrictive, and undefined. An independent adjudication committee evaluated subjects for diagnosis and phenotyping. We identified 166 (47.4%) patients who met the adapted criteria, including obstruction (n = 12, 3.4%), restriction (n = 67, 19.1%), mixed obstruction/restriction (n = 47, 13.4%), and undefined (n = 40, 11.4%). In these patients, less than half (n = 78) met the NIH criteria for BOS (NIH+); the rest (n = 88) did not (NIH-). The NIH- subjects showed increased risk of death compared with those without PcGVHD (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.20-2.95; P = .006) that was similar to NIH+ subjects (P = .678). Our study demonstrated the potential of the adapted criteria in identifying patients with high-risk PcGVHD that have been missed by the NIH criteria. The adapted criteria could become a valuable tool to better phenotype and study lung disease in cGVHD.

Indexed as

Bronchiolitis ObliteransGraft vs Host DiseaseAllograftsClinical Studies as TopicConsensusHumansLungRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35522969
PMCPMC9327555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.