Trial reportThe British journal of radiology2022
A deep learning-based approach for the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma: a new trial using CT.
Trial report in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localization and Classification of Adrenal Masses in Multiphase Computed Tomography: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Future: A Deep Learning Model for Accurate Detection of Adrenal Nodules.Radiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Adrenal lesion classification with abdomen caps and the effect of ROI size.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) models for the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma (AA) using CT.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 112 patients who underwent abdominal CT (non-contrast, early, and delayed phases) with 107 adrenal lesions (83 AAs and 24 non-AAs) confirmed pathologically and with 8 lesions confirmed by follow-up as metastatic carcinomas. Three patients had adrenal lesions on both sides. We constructed six DCNN models from six types of input images for comparison: non-contrast images only (Model A), delayed phase images only (Model B), three phasic images merged into a 3-channel (Model C), relative washout rate (RWR) image maps only (Model D), non-contrast and RWR maps merged into a 2-channel (Model E), and delayed phase and RWR maps merged into a 2-channel (Model F). These input images were prepared manually with cropping and registration of CT images. Each DCNN model with six convolutional layers was trained with data augmentation and hyperparameter tuning. The optimal threshold values for binary classification were determined from the receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses. We adopted the nested cross-validation method, in which the outer fivefold cross-validation was used to assess the diagnostic performance of the models and the inner fivefold cross-validation was used to tune hyperparameters of the models.
resultsThe areas under the curve with 95% confidence intervals of Models A-F were 0.94 [0.90, 0.98], 0.80 [0.69, 0.89], 0.97 [0.94, 1.00], 0.92 [0.85, 0.97], 0.99 [0.97, 1.00] and 0.94 [0.86, 0.99], respectively. Model E showed high area under the curve greater than 0.95.
conclusionDCNN models may be a useful tool for the diagnosis of AA using CT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The current study demonstrates a deep learning-based approach could differentiate adrenal adenoma from non-adenoma using multiphasic CT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.