ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023
Imaging of bone marrow pitfalls with emphasis on MRI.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Incidental bone marrow findings].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- MRI signal intensity per vertebral volume: a novel biomarker in pediatric osteoporosis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- The immature sacroiliac joints on cross-sectional imaging: developmental anatomy and diagnostic pitfalls.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Advancing bone tumor detection in older adults: the impact of AI-enhanced medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Pictorial review: challenges in distinguishing bilateral metaphyseal marrow abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2024Review
- Multiparametric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation time of bone metastasis in comparison with red or fatty bone marrow using magnetic resonance fingerprinting.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- [MR Imaging Features of Pediatric Bone Marrow].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2024Review
- In-phase and opposed-phase Dixon chemical shift imaging for the assessment of skeletal marrow lesions: comparison of measurements from longitudinal sequences to those from axial sequences.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Incidental imaging findings from head to toe: challenges and management: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Normal marrow contains both hematopoietic/red and fatty/yellow marrow with a predictable pattern of conversion and skeletal distribution on MRI. Many variations in normal bone marrow signal and appearances are apparent and the reporting radiologist must differentiate these from other non-neoplastic, benign or neoplastic processes. The advent of chemical shift imaging has helped in characterising and differentiating more focal heterogeneous areas of red marrow from marrow infiltration. This review aims to cover the MRI appearances of normal marrow, its evolution with age, marrow reconversion, variations of normal marrow signal, causes of oedema-like marrow signal, and some common non-neoplastic entities, which may mimic marrow neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.