Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522748›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Measuring vaccine effectiveness from limited public health datasets: Framework and estimates from India's second COVID wave.

Abhiroop Mukherjee, George Panayotov, Rik Sen, Harsha Dutta, Pulak Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abhiroop MukherjeeThe Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-9321-1592
George PanayotovThe Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8419-2227
Rik SenUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-8915
Harsha DuttaThe Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0003-0062-0165
Pulak GhoshIndian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4775-4179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite an urgent need, authorities in many countries are struggling to track COVID vaccine effectiveness (VE) because standard VE measures cannot be calculated from their public health data. Here, we use regression discontinuity design (RDD) to estimate VE, motivated by such limitations in public health records from West Bengal, India. These data cover 8,755,414 COVID vaccinations (90% ChAdOx1 NCov-19, almost all first doses, until May 2021), 8,179,635 tests, and 141,800 hospitalizations. The standard RDD exploits age-based vaccine eligibility; we also introduce a new RDD-based VE measure that improves on the standard one when better data are available. Applying these measures, we find a VE of 55.2% (95% confidence interval: 44.5 to 65.0%) against symptomatic disease, 80.1% (63.3 to 88.8%) against hospitalizations, and 85.5% (24.8 to 99.2%) against intensive care/critical care/high dependency admissions or deaths. Other data-deficient countries with age-based eligibility for any vaccine-and not just COVID vaccines-can also use these easy-to-implement measures to inform their own immunization policies.

Identifiers

PMID35522748
PMCPMC9075799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.