Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522649›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Efficacy and safety of combined oral sucrose and nonnutritive sucking in pain management for infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qiaohong Li, Xuerong Tan, Xueqing Li, Wenxiu Tang, Lin Mei, Gang Cheng, Yongrong Zou

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sucrose analgesia for heel-lance procedures in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Multimodal non-pharmacological pain relief during adhesive tape removal in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiaohong LiDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Xuerong TanDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Xueqing LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Wenxiu TangDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Lin MeiDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Gang ChengDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.
Yongrong ZouDepartment of Neonatology, Ya'an People's Hospital, Ya'an, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-1515
Ya'an Polytechnic College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain management is currently important in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The superiority in pain relief of the combined oral sucrose (OS) and nonnutritive sucking (NNS) to other single intervention has not been well established. The administration of sucrose has been considered to potentially induce adverse events, which has been controversial. This study aims to investigate the combined effects and safety in comparison with other single intervention methods, including NNS, OS alone, breast milk and oral glucose.

methodsWe searched databases including Medline (via Pubmed), Embase (via Ovid), web of science, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials from Jan 1, 2000 to Mar 31, 2021. The data were analyzed in the meta-analysis using Review manager Version 5.3. Pain score was the primary outcome in this meta-analysis. The adverse events were assessed qualitatively.

resultsA total of 16 studies were eligible in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in pain score in the NNS+OS group compared with NNS alone (SMD = -1.69, 95%CI, -1.69,-0.65) or sucrose alone (SMD = -1.39, 95% CI, -2.21,-0.57) during the painful procedures. When compared NNS+OS with breast milk, no significant difference was detected (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.5, 0.11).

conclusionThe combined effects of NNS and OS might be superior to other single intervention method. However, the effects might be mild for moderate-to-severe pain.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementSucroseFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPainPain MeasurementSucking BehaviorSucrose

Identifiers

PMID35522649
PMCPMC9075656
OpenAlexW4229065489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.