Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sex differences in post-stroke cognitive decline: A population-based longitudinal study of nationally representative data.

Abdulaziz T Bako, Thomas Potter, Jonika Tannous, Alan P Pan, Carnayla Johnson, Eman Baig, Brian Downer, Farhaan S Vahidy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex Differences in the Evaluation and Treatment of Stroke.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulaziz T BakoCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1584-8114
Thomas PotterCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Jonika TannousCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Alan P PanCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Carnayla JohnsonCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Eman BaigCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Brian DownerDepartment of Nutrition, Metabolism & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Farhaan S VahidyCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-2111
Houston Methodist · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSex differences in post-stroke cognitive decline have not been systematically evaluated in a nationally representative cohort. We use a quasi-experimental design to investigate sex differences in rate of post-stroke cognitive decline.

methodsUtilizing the event study design, we use the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data (1996-2016) to evaluate the differences (percentage points [95% Confidence interval]) in the rate of change in cognitive function, measured using the modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m) score, before and after incident stroke, and among patients with and without incident stroke. We estimated this event study model for the overall study population and separately fit the same model for male and female participants.

resultsOf 25,872 HRS participants included in our study, 14,459 (55.9%) were females with an overall mean age (SD) of 61.2 (9.3) years. Overall, 2,911 (11.3%) participants reported experiencing incident stroke. Participants with incident stroke (vs. no stroke) had lower baseline TICS-m score (15.6 vs. 16.1). Among participants with incident stroke, the mean pre-stroke TICS-m score was higher than the mean post-stroke TICS-m score (14.9 vs. 12.7). Event study revealed a significant short-term acceleration of cognitive decline for the overall population (4.2 [1.7-6.6] percentage points, p value = 0.001) and among female participants (5.0 [1.7-8.3] percentage points, p value = 0.003). We, however, found no evidence of long-term acceleration of cognitive decline after stroke. Moreover, among males, incident stroke was not associated with significant changes in rate of post-stroke cognitive decline.

conclusionFemales, in contrast to males, experience post-stroke cognitive deficits, particularly during early post-stroke period. Identifying the sex-specific stroke characteristics contributing to differences in post stroke cognitive decline may inform future strategies for reducing the burden of post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionStrokeCognitionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35522611
PMCPMC9075630
OpenAlexW4229049818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.