Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522333›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2022

Machine learning model prediction of 6-month functional outcome in elderly patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Gianluca Trevisi, Valerio Maria Caccavella, Alba Scerrati, Francesco Signorelli, Giuseppe Giovanni Salamone, Klizia Orsini, Christian Fasciani, Sonia D'Arrigo, Anna Maria Auricchio, Ginevra D'Onofrio and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluca TrevisiNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Valerio Maria CaccavellaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Alba ScerratiDepartment of Neurosurgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Francesco SignorelliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Giovanni SalamoneNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Klizia OrsiniNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Christian FascianiNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Sonia D'ArrigoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria AuricchioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Ginevra D'OnofrioDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco SalomiDepartment of Neurosurgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Alessio AlbaneseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Pasquale De BonisDepartment of Neurosurgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Annunziato MangiolaNeurosurgical Unit, Ospedale Spirito Santo, Pescara, Italy.
Carmelo Lucio SturialeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome, Italy. cropcircle.2000@virgilio.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-2492
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITOspedale di Santo Spirito · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has an increasing incidence and a worse outcome in elderly patients. The ability to predict the functional outcome in these patients can be helpful in supporting treatment decisions and establishing prognostic expectations. We evaluated the performance of a machine learning (ML) model to predict the 6-month functional status in elderly patients with ICH leveraging the predictive value of the clinical characteristics at hospital admission. Data were extracted by a retrospective multicentric database of patients ≥ 70 years of age consecutively admitted for the management of spontaneous ICH between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019. Relevant demographic, clinical, and radiological variables were selected by a feature selection algorithm (Boruta) and used to build a ML model. Outcome was determined according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at 6 months from ICH: dead (GOS 1), poor outcome (GOS 2-3: vegetative status/severe disability), and good outcome (GOS 4-5: moderate disability/good recovery). Ten features were selected by Boruta with the following relative importance order in the ML model: Glasgow Coma Scale, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ICH score, ICH volume, pupillary status, brainstem location, age, anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents, intraventricular hemorrhage, and cerebellar location. Random forest prediction model, evaluated on the hold-out test set, achieved an AUC of 0.96 (0.94-0.98), 0.89 (0.86-0.93), and 0.93 (0.90-0.95) for dead, poor, and good outcome classes, respectively, demonstrating high discriminative ability. A random forest classifier was successfully trained and internally validated to stratify elderly patients with spontaneous ICH into prognostic subclasses. The predictive value is enhanced by the ability of ML model to identify synergy among variables.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageMachine LearningAgedGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesConventional statisticsHemorrhagic strokeIntracerebral hemorrhageIntracranial hemorrhageMachine learningOutcome

Identifiers

PMID35522333
PMCPMC9349060
OpenAlexW4229009575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.