Classification of

purposeEnd-of-life studies have validated the binary visual reads of

methodsWe applied SVM with a linear kernel to an

resultsThe classifiers yielded adequate specificity and sensitivity within the end-of-life dataset (neuritic amyloid plaque density classifier: specificity of 90.2% and sensitivity of 83.7%; amyloid phase classifier: specificity of 98.4% and sensitivity of 84.0%). The regions with the highest feature weights corresponded to precuneus, caudate, anteromedial prefrontal, and also posterior inferior temporal and inferior parietal cortex. In the cognitively normal cohort, the correlation coefficient between CL and distance to the hyperplane was -0.66 for the classifier trained with neuritic amyloid plaque density, and -0.88 for the classifier trained with amyloid phases. This difference was significant. The optimal CL cut-off for discriminating positive versus negative scans was CL = 48-51 for the different classifiers (area under the curve (AUC) = 99.9%), except for the classifier trained with amyloid phases and based on the 10% voxels with highest feature weights. There the cut-off was CL = 26 (AUC = 99.5%), which closely matched the CL threshold for discriminating phases 0-2 from 3-5 based on the end-of-life dataset and the neuropathological ground truth. DISCUSSION: Among a set of neuropathologically validated classifiers trained with end-of-life cases, transfer to a cognitively normal population works best for a classifier trained with amyloid phases and using only voxels with the highest amplitudes of feature weights.