ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Morbidities and prognostic factors after tibial pilon fracture: impact on patients.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of the four-step fixed-base reconstruction method for Rüedi-Allgöwer Ⅲ Pilon fracture.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Contemporary Long-Term Patient Reported Outcomes of Pilon Fractures.ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aims primarily to characterize the sequelae and morbidity associated with tibial pilon injuries from the patients' perspectives in terms of multiple surgical interventions, duration of hospital stay, downtime from work, loss of productivity and impact on patients' lives. The secondary aim is to review the associated risk factors for these morbidities. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll patients with surgically treated tibial pilon fractures from 1st July 2007 to 30th June 2017 were included. The morbidities reviewed focused on delay to surgery, numbers of surgeries, limb amputation, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, duration of medical leave (ML), follow-up and number of outpatient visits.
resultsThere were 102 patients included in the review and up to 70% of them had an average 7 days delay to definitive surgery. They also required an average hospital LOS of at least 2 weeks extending up to 3 more weeks if soft tissue reconstruction was necessitated. Up to a third of patients were readmitted with 15% of them needing further treatment. These patients required a notable period of downtime from work as shown in the long ML (mean 152.6 days [S.D. = 110.7]). Multiple conditional regression models showed AO/OTA classification (B and C) and open fracture as independent predictors of delay to surgery. Predictors for increased LOS were high velocity mechanism of injury at 4 days longer and patients who needed soft tissue reconstruction at 21 days longer. In terms of downtime from work, only work injury has been identified as an independent predictor of ML at 88.5 days longer.
conclusionTibial pilon fractures leads to significant morbidities with profound negative impact on patients' lives in terms of multiple surgical interventions required, prolonged hospital stay, need for readmissions and prolonged downtime from work. These morbidities from patients' perspective should be emphasized to patients and employers to manage their expectations and potential limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.