Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522279›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Mistreatment Experiences, Protective Workplace Systems, and Occupational Distress in Physicians.

Susannah G Rowe, Miriam T Stewart, Sam Van Horne, Cassandra Pierre, Hanhan Wang, Makaila Manukyan, Megan Bair-Merritt, Aviva Lee-Parritz, Mary P Rowe, Tait Shanafelt and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07221422 (The PREGNANT), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07221422 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The PREGNANT (Pregnant Resident Empowerment, GuidaNce, and Advocacy iN Training) Coaching Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsBurnout, Professional, Well-Being, Psychological, Imposter Phenomenon, Self EfficacyArmsCoaching Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Empirical Assessment of Well-Being: The Stanford Model of Occupational Well-Being.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Development of a Brief, Positively Framed Care Team Experience Measure.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Susannah G RoweOffice of Equity, Vitality and Inclusion, Boston University Medical Group, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Miriam T StewartChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Sam Van HorneCenter for WorkLife Wellbeing, ChristianaCare, Wilmington, Delaware.
Cassandra PierreOffice of Equity, Vitality and Inclusion, Boston University Medical Group, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hanhan WangStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Makaila ManukyanOffice of Equity, Vitality and Inclusion, Boston University Medical Group, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Megan Bair-MerrittOffice of Equity, Vitality and Inclusion, Boston University Medical Group, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Aviva Lee-ParritzOffice of Equity, Vitality and Inclusion, Boston University Medical Group, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mary P RoweSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Tait ShanafeltStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Mickey TrockelStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Reducing physician occupational distress requires understanding workplace mistreatment, its relationship to occupational well-being, and how mistreatment differentially impacts physicians of diverse identities. Objectives: To assess the prevalence and sources of mistreatment among physicians and associations between mistreatment, occupational well-being, and physicians' perceptions of protective workplace systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was administered in September and October 2020 to physicians at a large academic medical center. Statistical analysis was performed from May 2021 to February 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary measures were the Professional Fulfillment Index, a measure of intent to leave, and the Mistreatment, Protection, and Respect Measure (MPR). Main outcomes were the prevalence and sources of mistreatment. Secondary outcomes were the associations of mistreatment and perceptions of protective workplace systems with occupational well-being. Results: Of 1909 medical staff invited, 1505 (78.8%) completed the survey. Among respondents, 735 (48.8%) were women, 627 (47.1%) were men, and 143 (9.5%) did not share gender identity or chose "other"; 12 (0.8%) identified as African American or Black, 392 (26%) as Asian, 10 (0.7%) as multiracial, 736 (48.9%) as White, 63 (4.2%) as other, and 292 (19.4%) did not share race or ethnicity. Of the 1397 respondents who answered mistreatment questions, 327 (23.4%) reported experiencing mistreatment in the last 12 months. Patients and visitors were the most common source of mistreatment, reported by 232 physicians (16.6%). Women were more than twice as likely as men to experience mistreatment (31% [224 women] vs 15% [92 men]). On a scale of 0 to 10, mistreatment was associated with a 1.13 point increase in burnout (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.36), a 0.99-point decrease in professional fulfillment (95% CI, -1.24 to -0.73), and 129% higher odds of moderate or greater intent to leave (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.75 to 2.99). When compared with a perception that protective workplace systems are in place "to a very great extent," a perception that there are no protective workplace systems was associated with a 2.41-point increase in burnout (95% CI, 1.80 to 3.02), a 2.81-point lower professional fulfillment score (95% CI, -3.44 to -2.18), and 711% higher odds of intending to leave (odds ratio, 8.11; 95% CI, 3.67 to 18.35). Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that mistreatment was common among physicians, varied by gender, and was associated with occupational distress. Patients and visitors were the most frequent source, and perceptions of protective workplace systems were associated with better occupational well-being. These findings suggest that health care organizations should prioritize reducing workplace mistreatment.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalPhysiciansFemaleGender IdentityHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID35522279
PMCPMC9077480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.