Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522231›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2022

Physician- versus practice-level primary care continuity and association with outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries.

Zhou Yang, Ishani Ganguli, Caitlin Davis, Mingliang Dai, Jill Shuemaker, Lars Peterson, Andrew Bazemore, Robert Phillips, Yoon Kyung Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Personal GP continuity improves healthcare outcomes in primary care populations: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient characteristics and degrees of discontinuity of care in Danish general practice: a cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What Humans Need.Annals of family medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhou YangClinical Research, Omada Health, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9755-5891
Ishani GanguliInternal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3793-0995
Caitlin DavisResidency Program, Inova Fairfax Family Medicine, Residency Program, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Mingliang DaiResearch Team, American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6926-2514
Jill ShuemakerExecutive Team, The Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Lars PetersonResearch Team, American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Andrew BazemoreExecutive Team, The Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Robert PhillipsExecutive Team, The Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Yoon Kyung ChungResearch, The Robert Graham Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare physician-level versus practice-level primary care continuity and their association with expenditure and acute care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries and evaluate whether continuity of outpatient primary care at either/both physician or/and practice level could be useful quality measures. DATA SOURCE: Medicare Fee-For-Service claims data for community dwelling beneficiaries without end-stage renal disease who were attributed to a national random sample of primary care practices billing Medicare (2011-2017). STUDY

designRetrospective secondary data analysis at per Medicare beneficiary per year level. We used multivariable linear regression with practice-level fixed effects to estimate continuity of care score at physician versus practice level and their associations with outcomes. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodWe calculated clinician- and practice-level Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index scores, ranging from 0 to 1, using primary care outpatient claims. Medicare expenditures, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions were obtained from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File: Cost and Utilization Segment. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were defined using diagnosis codes on inpatient claims. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe studied 2,359,400 beneficiaries who sought care from 13,926 physicians. Every 0.1 increase in physician continuity score was associated with a $151 reduction in expenditure per beneficiary per year (p < 0.01), and every 0.1 increase in practice continuity score was associated with $282 decrease (p < 0.01) per beneficiary per year. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower Medicare expenditures among small, medium, and large practices. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower probabilities of hospitalization, ED visit, admissions for ACSC, and readmission.

conclusionsPrimary care continuity of care could serve as a potent value-based care quality metric. Physician-level continuity is a unique value center that cannot be supplanted by practice-level continuity.

Indexed as

MedicarePhysiciansAgedContinuity of Patient CareFee-for-Service PlansHumansRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescontinuity of carepopulation healthprimary carevalue-based payment

Identifiers

PMID35522231
PMCPMC9264477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.