Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522191›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2022

Exploring Variation in the Receipt of Recommended Active Surveillance for Men with Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Archana Radhakrishnan, Lauren P Wallner, Ted A Skolarus, Arvin K George, Bradley H Rosenberg, Paul Abrahamse, Sarah T Hawley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Archana RadhakrishnanDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lauren P WallnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ted A SkolarusDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Arvin K GeorgeDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Bradley H RosenbergDepartment of Urology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.
Paul AbrahamseDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sarah T HawleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

The EPICS (Engaging Primary care in Cancer Survivorship) study: A trial of novel models of care for cancer survivorsR01CA249419 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HAHN, ERIN ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2024
$3.7M
De-implementation of low value castration for men with prostate cancerR37CA222885 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SAINI, SAMEER DEV, SKOLARUS, TED ALBERT · 2018 to 2023
$3.6M
Refining castration use for recurrent prostate cancerR01CA242559 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SKOLARUS, TED ALBERT, TSODIKOV, ALEXANDER · 2020 to 2023
$1.4M
Engaging PCPs to optimize active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancerK08CA245237 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RADHAKRISHNAN, ARCHANA · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA245237NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242559NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249419NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMen on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer do not receive all the recommended testing. Reasons for variation in receipt are unknown. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe combined prospective registry data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, a collaborative of 46 academic and community urology practices across Michigan, with insurance claims from 2014 to 2018 for men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer. We defined receipt of recommended surveillance according to the collaborative's low-intensity criteria as: annual prostate specific antigen testing and either magnetic resonance imaging or prostate biopsy every 3 years. We assessed receipt of recommended surveillance among men with ≥36 months of followup (246). We conducted multilevel analyses to examine the influence of the urologist, urologist and primary care provider visits, and patient demographic and clinical factors on variation in receipt.

resultsDuring 3 years of active surveillance, just over half of men (56.5%) received all recommended surveillance testing (69.9% annual prostate specific antigen testing, 72.8% magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy). We found 19% of the variation in receipt was attributed to individual urologists. While increasing provider visits were not significantly associated with receipt, older men were less likely to receive magnetic resonance imaging/biopsy (≥75 vs <55 years, adjusted odds ratio 0.07; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.81).

conclusionsNearly half of men on active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer did not receive all recommended surveillance. While urologists substantially influenced receipt of recommended testing, exploring how to leverage patients and their visits with their primary care providers to positively influence receipt appears warranted.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleProstateWatchful WaitingProstate-Specific Antigenbiopsyprimary health careprostate-specific antigenurologistswatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID35522191
PMCPMC9378546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.