Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35522017›Full record

ReviewVeterinary and comparative oncology2022

Diagnosis and histopathologic prognostication of canine melanocytic neoplasms: A consensus of the Oncology-Pathology Working Group.

Rebecca C Smedley, Laura Bongiovanni, Cynthia Bacmeister, Craig A Clifford, Neil Christensen, Jennifer M Dreyfus, Joy M Gary, Alana Pavuk, Peter H Rowland, Christine Swanson and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Rebecca C SmedleyVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5704-2664
Laura BongiovanniFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Cynthia BacmeisterAnatomic Pathology, Antech Diagnostics, Fountain Valley, California, USA.
Craig A CliffordOncology Service, Hope Veterinary Specialists/BluePearl, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA.
Neil ChristensenOncology Service, Veterinary Specialty Hospital Hong Kong, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.
Jennifer M DreyfusAnatomic Pathology, Dreyfus Veterinary Pathology Consulting, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Joy M GaryNeuropathology, StageBio, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Alana PavukAnatomic Pathology, Antech Diagnostics, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Peter H RowlandBiopsy Service, Histopath Consulting, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine SwansonOncology Service, BluePearl Specialty and Emergency Pet Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Chelsea TrippOncology Service, Bridge Animal Referral Center, Edmonds, Washington, USA.
J Paul WoodsClinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Philip J BergmanClinical Studies, VCA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Building Bridges · USCarolina Veterinary Specialists · USCS Diagnostics · DEMichigan State University · USMuseum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles · USNational Institutes of Health · USParkinson's and Movement Disorder Institute · USUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Teramo · ITUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWisconsin Department of Transportation · USWorcester Public Schools · USYoung Men's Christian Association Of Greater Grand Rapids · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the primary objectives of the Oncology Pathology Working Group (OPWG) is for oncologists and pathologists to collaboratively generate consensus documents to standardize aspects of and provide guidelines for veterinary oncologic pathology. Consensus is established through review of relevant peer-reviewed literature relative to a subgroup's particular focus. In this article, the authors provide a critical review of the current literature for the diagnosis of, and histopathologic prognostication for, canine cutaneous and oral/lip melanocytic neoplasms, suggest guidelines for reporting, provide recommendations for clinical interpretation, and discuss future directions. This document represents the opinions of the working group and the authors and does not constitute a formal endorsement by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists, American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine or the Veterinary Cancer Society.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesNeoplasmsPathology, VeterinaryAnimalsDogsMedical Oncologycancerdogsmelanomaoncologypathologyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35522017
PMCPMC9796073
OpenAlexW4229010237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.