Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521801›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2022

Management of neuroendocrine neoplasms: conformity with guidelines in and outside a center of excellence.

Carole Morin, Keo-Morakort Benedetto, Agathe Deville, Laurent Milot, Aurélie Theillaumas, Valérie Hervieu, Mathieu Pioche, Gilles Poncet, Julien Forestier, Laurent François and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Step-by-Step Approach to the Incidental Diagnosis of Type I Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: Practical Insights.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carole MorinHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8720-9426
Keo-Morakort BenedettoHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Agathe DevilleHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Médecine Nucléaire, Bron, France.
Laurent MilotHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Radiologie, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Aurélie TheillaumasHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Valérie HervieuCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, UMR Inserm 1052 CNRS 5286, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Mathieu PiocheUniversity of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France.
Gilles PoncetCentre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon, UMR Inserm 1052 CNRS 5286, Lyon Cedex 08, France.
Julien ForestierHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Laurent FrançoisHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Exploration Fonctionnelle, Bron Cedex, France.
Francoise Borson-ChazotUniversity of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2515-7840
Mustapha AdhamUniversity of Lyon, Université Lyon 1, France.
Catherine Lombard-BohasHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.
Thomas WalterHospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Oncologie Digestive, Lyon Cedex 03, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4199-4561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To improve neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) management, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) recognised 62 Centers of Excellence (CoE). This retrospective study compares conformity of patients' initial management within vs outside an ENETS CoE with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Patients diagnosed with a NEN between August 2018 and July 2020 and presented in the Lyon-CoE Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MDT) were included. Factors potentially associated with the conformity of initial management (work-up and first treatment) to CPG underwent univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Among the 615 included patients, 170 (27.6%) were initially managed in the CoE and 445 (72.4%) were only presented at the CoE-MDT. Patients in the CoE group more often had intestinal or pancreatic primaries, metastatic disease (61.8% vs 33%), hereditary syndrome, and a functioning tumour. Work-up conformity was 37.1% in the CoE (vs 29.9%, P = 0.09); this was 95.8% for the first treatment (vs 88.7%, P = 0.01). After multivariate analysis, CPG conformity was significantly higher for patients managed in the CoE, for younger patients, for those having a grade 1-2 tumour, and a genetic syndrome. Pancreatic and small intestinal (SI) NET surgeries performed in the CoE had a higher splenic preservation rate during left pancreatectomy, better detection of multiple tumours in SI surgeries, and higher number of resected lymph nodes. Conclusions: Given the widespread observance of CPG, not all patients require management in the CoE. Referral should be considered for more complex cases such as metastatic diseases, G2 tumours, or carcinoid syndromes. Finally, we should encourage the centralization of NET surgery.

Indexed as

conformity to clinical guidelinesdiagnostic managementENETS center of excellenceneuroendocrine neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID35521801
PMCPMC9254288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.