Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521676›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2022

Clinician Agreement on the Classification of Thyroid Nodules Ultrasound Features: A Survey of 2 Endocrine Societies.

Nydia Burgos, Jing Zhao, Juan P Brito, Jenny K Hoang, Fabian Pitoia, Spyridoula Maraka, M Regina Castro, Ji-Hyun Lee, Naykky Singh Ospina

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05982821 (A Multicenter Study of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05982821 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter Study of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

TypeinterventionalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled1,955ConditionsThyroid NoduleArmsArtificial Intelligence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nydia BurgosDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Jing ZhaoDivision of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Juan P BritoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jenny K HoangDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Fabian PitoiaDivision of Endocrinology, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2742-7085
Spyridoula MarakaKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
M Regina CastroDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ji-Hyun LeeDivision of Quantitative Sciences, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Naykky Singh OspinaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4240-6239

Funding

Adequate selection of patients for thyroid biopsy: evaluation of a shared decision making conversation aidK08CA248972 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI SINGH OSPINA, NAYKKY · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
Arkansas Biosciences InstituteNCI NIH HHS K08 CA248972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThyroid nodule risk stratification allows clinicians to standardize the evaluation of thyroid cancer risk according to ultrasound features.

objectiveTo evaluate interrater agreement among clinicians assessing thyroid nodules ultrasound features and thyroid cancer risk categories. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe surveyed Endocrine Society and Latin American Thyroid Society members to assess their interpretation of composition, echogenicity, shape, margins, and presence of echogenic foci of 10 thyroid nodule cases. The risk category for thyroid cancer was calculated following the American College of Radiology-Thyroid Imaging Reporting & Data System (ACR-TIRADS) framework from individual responses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used descriptive statistics and Gwet's agreement coefficient (AC1) to assess the primary outcome of interrater agreement for ACR-TIRADS risk category. As secondary outcomes, the interrater agreement for individual features and a subgroup analysis of interrater agreement for the ACR-TIRADS category were performed (ultrasound reporting system, type of practice, and number of monthly appraisals).

resultsA total of 144 participants were included, mostly endocrinologists. There was moderate level of agreement for the absence of echogenic foci (AC1 0.53, 95% CI 0.24-0.81) and composition (AC1 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.71). The agreement for margins (AC1 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.33), echogenicity (AC1 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.46), and shape assessment (AC1 0.42, 95% CI 0.13-0.70) was lower. The overall agreement for ACR-TIRADS assessment was AC1 0.29, (95% CI 0.13-0.45). The AC1 of ACR-TIRADS among subgroups was similar.

conclusionsThis study found high variation of judgments about ACR-TIRADS risk category and individual features, which poses a potential challenge for the widescale implementation of thyroid nodule risk stratification.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyreproducibilitythyroid cancerthyroid nodules

Identifiers

PMID35521676
PMCPMC9282353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.