Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521634›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2022

Feasibility and acceptability of using the novel urine-based FujiLAM test to detect tuberculosis: A multi-country mixed-methods study.

Sekai Chenai Mathabire Rücker, Pascale Lissouba, Milcah Akinyi, Alex Vicent Lubega, Rosanna Stewart, Natalia Tamayo Antabak, Ivan Taremwa Mugisha, Liesbet Ohler, Hélder Macuácua, May Atieno and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sekai Chenai Mathabire RückerEpicentre Paris, France.
Pascale LissoubaEpicentre Paris, France.
Milcah AkinyiMédecins Sans Frontières Homa Bay, Kenya.
Alex Vicent LubegaEpicentre Mbarara Research Centre Mbarara, Uganda.
Rosanna StewartMédecins Sans Frontières Eshowe, South Africa.
Natalia Tamayo AntabakMédecins Sans Frontières Maputo, Mozambique.
Ivan Taremwa MugishaEpicentre Mbarara Research Centre Mbarara, Uganda.
Liesbet OhlerMédecins Sans Frontières Eshowe, South Africa.
Hélder MacuácuaMédecins Sans Frontières Maputo, Mozambique.
May AtienoMédecins Sans Frontières Homa Bay, Kenya.
Winnie MuyindikeEpicentre Paris, France.
Stavia TuryahabweNational Tuberculosis and Leprosy Programme, Ministry of Health, Uganda.
Gordon Odhiambo OkomoMinistry of Health, Homa Bay County, Kenya.
Aleny Mahomed CoutoPrograma Nacional de Controlo de ITS, HIV e SIDA e Hepatites (National Control Program for ITS, HIV and AIDS and Hepatitis), Mozambique.
Mohammed MusokeMédecins Sans Frontières Homa Bay, Kenya.
Claire BossardEpicentre Paris, France.
Catherine HewisonMédecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Zibusiso NdlovuMédecins Sans Frontières Southern Africa Medical Unit, Cape Town, South Africa.
Helena HuergaEpicentre Paris, France.
Médecins Sans Frontières · ZAVétérinaires Sans Frontières Suisse · KEEpicentre Uganda · UGMbarara University of Science and Technology · UGMédecins Sans Frontières · FRMinistry of Health · KEMinistry of Health · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The novel urine-based FujiLAM test identifies tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients but may be challenging to use at point-of-care (POC). Objectives: We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using the FujiLAM test at point of care in outpatient settings. Methods: We conducted a mixed methods study in four outpatient settings in Kenya, Mozambique, South Africa, and Uganda between November 2020 and September 2021. The test was performed at POC in existing clinic laboratories and consultation spaces. We performed direct observations in the four health facilities, individual questionnaires, proficiency testing evaluations, and individual interviews among healthcare workers performing the FujiLAM test (healthcare workers), and group discussions with programme managers. Results: Overall, 18/19 (95%) healthcare workers and 14/14 (100%) managers agreed to participate in the study. Most assessed healthcare workers, including lay health workers (10/11; 91%), met the minimum required theoretical knowledge and practical skill in performing the FujiLAM test. Most healthcare workers (17/18; 94%) found the FujiLAM test overall " Conclusions: Implementing the FujiLAM test in outpatient POC settings is feasible and acceptable to healthcare workers and managers. This test can be performed in various clinic locations by any healthcare worker. The timed, multi-step test procedure is challenging and may affect the workload in resource-constrained health facilities.

Indexed as

Diagnostic testsFeasibility studiesFujiLAMLow income settingsTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35521634
PMCPMC9065638
OpenAlexW4224440640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.