Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521552›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

NAToRA, a relatedness-pruning method to minimize the loss of dataset size in genetic and omics analyses.

Thiago Peixoto Leal, Vinicius C Furlan, Mateus Henrique Gouveia, Julia Maria Saraiva Duarte, Pablo As Fonseca, Rafael Tou, Marilia de Oliveira Scliar, Gilderlanio Santana de Araujo, Lucas F Costa, Camila Zolini and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. X-Chromosome Association Study in Latin American Cohorts Identifies New Loci in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Thiago Peixoto LealDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Vinicius C FurlanDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Mateus Henrique GouveiaDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Julia Maria Saraiva DuarteDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Pablo As FonsecaDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Rafael TouDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marilia de Oliveira ScliarCentro de Estudos do Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gilderlanio Santana de AraujoLaboratório de Genética Humana e Médica, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Lucas F CostaDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Camila ZoliniDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Maria Gabriela Campolina Diniz PeixotoEmbrapa Gado de Leite, Embrapa, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Raquel Santos CarvalhoDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Lima-CostaInstituto René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Robert H GilmanUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Lima, Perú.
Eduardo Tarazona-SantosDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Maíra Ribeiro RodriguesDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Funding

Modeling the impact of Women's Specific Health Factors in PD outcomes in LatinasR01NS112499 · NINDS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI FERNANDEZ MATA, IGNACIO · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and omics analyses frequently require independent observations, which is not guaranteed in real datasets. When relatedness cannot be accounted for, solutions involve removing related individuals (or observations) and, consequently, a reduction of available data. We developed a network-based relatedness-pruning method that minimizes dataset reduction while removing unwanted relationships in a dataset. It uses node degree centrality metric to identify highly connected nodes (or individuals) and implements heuristics that approximate the minimal reduction of a dataset to allow its application to complex datasets. When compared with two other popular population genetics methodologies (PLINK and KING), NAToRA shows the best combination of removing all relatives while keeping the largest possible number of individuals in all datasets tested and also, with similar effects on the allele frequency spectrum and Principal Component Analysis than PLINK and KING. NAToRA is freely available, both as a standalone tool that can be easily incorporated as part of a pipeline, and as a graphical web tool that allows visualization of the relatedness networks. NAToRA also accepts a variety of relationship metrics as input, which facilitates its use. We also release a genealogies simulator software used for different tests performed in this study.

Indexed as

ARP, All-Relatives PruningComplex network theoryDU, Dataset UnrelatedGenealogies simulatorGenetic kinshipGRM, Genetic Relatedness MatrixKING, Kinship-based INference for Genome-wide association studiesMAF, Minor Allele FrequencyNAToRA, Network Algorithm to Relatedness AnalysisNc, Network with cutsNDC, Node Degree CentralityPCA, Principal Component AnalysisPopulation geneticsREAP, Relatedness Estimation in Admixed PopulationsSNV, Single Nucleotide Variation

Identifiers

PMID35521552
PMCPMC9046962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.