ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Scalable in-memory processing of omics workflows.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a proof of concept implementation of the in-memory computing paradigm that we use to facilitate the analysis of metagenomic sequencing reads. In doing so we compare the performance of POSIX™file systems and key-value storage for omics data, and we show the potential for integrating high-performance computing (HPC) and cloud native technologies. We show that in-memory key-value storage offers possibilities for improved handling of omics data through more flexible and faster data processing. We envision fully containerized workflows and their deployment in portable micro-pipelines with multiple instances working concurrently with the same distributed in-memory storage. To highlight the potential usage of this technology for event driven and real-time data processing, we use a biological case study focused on the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We develop a workflow encompassing bioinformatics and explainable machine learning (ML) to predict life expectancy of a population based on the microbiome of its sewage while providing a description of AMR contribution to the prediction. We propose that in future, performing such analyses in 'real-time' would allow us to assess the potential risk to the population based on changes in the AMR profile of the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.