Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521531›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Organic acid cross-linked 3D printed cellulose nanocomposite bioscaffolds with controlled porosity, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility.

Andreja Dobaj Štiglic, Fazilet Gürer, Florian Lackner, Doris Bračič, Armin Winter, Lidija Gradišnik, Damjan Makuc, Rupert Kargl, Isabel Duarte, Janez Plavec and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreja Dobaj ŠtiglicUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Fazilet GürerUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Florian LacknerGraz University of Technology, Institute for Chemistry and Technology of Biobased System (IBioSys), Stremayrgasse 9, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Doris BračičUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Armin WinterUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) Institute of Wood Technology and Renewable Materials, Konrad-Lorenz-Strasse 24, 3430 Tulln, Austria.
Lidija GradišnikUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Taborska Ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Damjan MakucSlovenian NMR Center, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Rupert KarglUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Isabel DuarteUniversity of Aveiro, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Center for Mechanical Technology and Automation, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.
Janez PlavecSlovenian NMR Center, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Uros MaverUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Taborska Ulica 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
Marco BeaumontUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Chemistry of Renewable Resources, Konrad-Lorenz-Strasse 24, 3430 Tulln, Austria.
Karin Stana KleinschekGraz University of Technology, Institute for Chemistry and Technology of Biobased System (IBioSys), Stremayrgasse 9, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Tamilselvan MohanUniversity of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Characterization and Processing of Polymers, Smetanova Ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia.
University of Maribor · SIBOKU University · ATGraz University of Technology · ATNational Institute of Chemistry · SIUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 4356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we fabricated chemically cross-linked polysaccharide-based three-dimensional (3D) porous scaffolds using an ink composed of nanofibrillated cellulose, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid (CA), featuring strong shear thinning behavior and adequate printability. Scaffolds were produced by combining direct-ink-writing 3D printing, freeze-drying, and dehydrothermal heat-assisted cross-linking techniques. The last step induces a reaction of CA. Degree of cross-linking was controlled by varying the CA concentration (2.5-10.0 wt.%) to tune the structure, swelling, degradation, and surface properties (pores: 100-450 μm, porosity: 86%) of the scaffolds in the dry and hydrated states. Compressive strength, elastic modulus, and shape recovery of the cross-linked scaffolds increased significantly with increasing cross-linker concentration. Cross-linked scaffolds promoted clustered cell adhesion and showed no cytotoxic effects as determined by the viability assay and live/dead staining with human osteoblast cells. The proposed method can be extended to all polysaccharide-based materials to develop cell-friendly scaffolds suitable for tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

BiomaterialsMaterials scienceTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID35521531
PMCPMC9062678
OpenAlexW4226236778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.