Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35521514›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

A network model of glymphatic flow under different experimentally-motivated parametric scenarios.

Jeffrey Tithof, Kimberly A S Boster, Peter A R Bork, Maiken Nedergaard, John H Thomas, Douglas H Kelley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High frame ratebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A brain-wide solute transport model of the glymphatic system.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Modeling of brain efflux: Constraints of brain surfaces.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeffrey TithofDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA.
Kimberly A S BosterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA.
Peter A R BorkCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maiken NedergaardCenter for Translational Neuromedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen N, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John H ThomasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA.
Douglas H KelleyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Rochester, 235 Hopeman Building, Rochester 14627, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Age and AD related bottlenecks in glymphatic-lymphatic waste transportRF1AG057575 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN · 2017 to 2017
$3.2M
Capillary hyperemia in white matter: Novel mechanistic insight and effect of hypertension and agingRF1NS110049 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI NEDERGAARD, MAIKEN, WAN, JIANDI · 2018 to 2018
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG057575NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS110049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) in the brain delivers nutrients, clears metabolic waste, and causes edema formation. Brain-wide imaging cannot resolve PVSs, and high-resolution methods cannot access deep tissue. However, theoretical models provide valuable insight. We model the CSF pathway as a network of hydraulic resistances, using published parameter values. A few parameters (permeability of PVSs and the parenchyma, and dimensions of PVSs and astrocyte endfoot gaps) have wide uncertainties, so we focus on the limits of their ranges by analyzing different parametric scenarios. We identify low-resistance PVSs and high-resistance parenchyma as the only scenario that satisfies three essential criteria: that the flow be driven by a small pressure drop, exhibit good CSF perfusion throughout the cortex, and exhibit a substantial increase in flow during sleep. Our results point to the most important parameters, such as astrocyte endfoot gap dimensions, to be measured in future experiments.

Indexed as

In silico biologyNeuroscienceSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID35521514
PMCPMC9062681
OpenAlexW4225712730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.