ArticleDigital health
Artificial intelligence and medical education: A global mixed-methods study of medical students' perspectives.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is it time to introduce an artificial intelligence curriculum in undergraduate medical education? medical students' perspectives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
- "First, do no harm" in the digital era: examining the practicality of the European Health Data Space proposal and ethical implications of artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review.BMC medical ethics · 2026Pooled it
- Medical, dental, and nursing students' attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing digital health curriculum needs: a mixed-methods study of student and faculty perspectives in a Singapore medical school.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Generative Language Models in Medical Education: From Advent to Entrustment.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Scoring Improves Interobserver Agreement in Breast Cancer Biomarker Evaluation.Cancers · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Large Language Models in Acute-on-Chronic Pancreatitis: An Exploratory Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Design-Driven Innovation Path of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Healthcare: Theory, Practice, and Future Prospects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Enhancing Self-Care Consultation Skills in Pharmacy Education: Benefits of Virtual Patients and Artificial Intelligence-A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Medical students' and faculty members' perceptions and experiences of AI integration in health care practice and in medical curricula: A meta-ethnographic review.Medical education · 2026Review
- Moving beyond one-size-fits-all education approaches for artificial intelligence in healthcare.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing the level of readiness for digital transformation in medicine: students' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in health : a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transformative Potential, Current Applications, and Future Implications.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- University students' acceptance of generative artificial intelligence tools: a mixed-methods study on opinions, attitudes, and behavioral intentions.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- AI Literacy Among Chinese Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Examination of Individual and Environmental Factors.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Preparing tomorrow's physicians for AI-driven healthcare: insights from a study on medical students', interns', and residents' knowledge, attitudes, and educational needs.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic and Narrative Review of Pedagogical Potential and Ethical Implications.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Medical students, as clinicians and healthcare leaders of the future, are key stakeholders in the clinical roll-out of artificial intelligence-driven technologies. The authors aim to provide the first report on the state of artificial intelligence in medical education globally by exploring the perspectives of medical students. Methods: The authors carried out a mixed-methods study of focus groups and surveys with 128 medical students from 48 countries. The study explored knowledge around artificial intelligence as well as what students wished to learn about artificial intelligence and how they wished to learn this. A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis was used. Results: Support for incorporating teaching on artificial intelligence into core curricula was ubiquitous across the globe, but few students had received teaching on artificial intelligence. Students showed knowledge on the applications of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine as well as on artificial intelligence ethics. They were interested in learning about clinical applications, algorithm development, coding and algorithm appraisal. Hackathon-style projects and multidisciplinary education involving computer science students were suggested for incorporation into the curriculum. Conclusions: Medical students from all countries should be provided teaching on artificial intelligence as part of their curriculum to develop skills and knowledge around artificial intelligence to ensure a patient-centred digital future in medicine. This teaching should focus on the applications of artificial intelligence in clinical medicine. Students should also be given the opportunity to be involved in algorithm development. Students in low- and middle-income countries require the foundational technology as well as robust teaching on artificial intelligence to ensure that they can drive innovation in their healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.