ArticleRSC advances2019
Comparative study of hydroxyapatite, fluor-hydroxyapatite and Si-substituted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on osteogenic, osteoclastic and antibacterial ability.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances of Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Dental Implant Applications.International dental journal · 2025Review
- Physico-Chemical and Biological Features of Fluorine-Substituted Hydroxyapatite Suspensions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Design and evaluation ofDrug delivery · 2023Article
- Hydroxyapatite or Fluorapatite-Which Bioceramic Is Better as a Base for the Production of Bone Scaffold?-A Comprehensive Comparative Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Hydrothermal Synthesis of Fluorapatite Coatings over Titanium Implants for Enhanced Osseointegration-An In Vivo Study in the Rabbit.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Article
- The Cytokine and Bone Protein Expression by Ellagic Acid-Hydroxyapatite in Bone Remodelling Model.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the effects of hydroxyapatite (HA), fluor-hydroxyapatite (FHA) and Si-substituted hydroxyapatite (SiHA) on osteogenic differentiation, osteoclastic activity and antibacterial properties. HA, FHA and SiHA were prepared
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.