ArticleHeliyon2022
Classification of retinoblastoma-1 gene mutation with machine learning-based models in bladder cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multi-Thresholding-Based Discriminative Neural Classifier for Detection of Retinoblastoma Using CNN Models.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Advancing retinoblastoma detection based on binary arithmetic optimization and integrated features.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Construction and prognostic value of enhanced CT image omics model for noninvasive prediction of HRG in bladder cancer based on logistic regression and support vector machine algorithm.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the potential of machine learning algorithms built with radiomics features from computed tomography urography (CTU) images that classify RB1 gene mutation status in bladder cancer. Method: The study enrolled CTU images of 18 patients with and 54 without RB1 mutation from a public database. Image and data preprocessing were performed after data augmentation. Feature selection steps were consisted of filter and wrapper methods. Pearson's correlation analysis was the filter, and a wrapper-based sequential feature selection algorithm was the wrapper. Models with XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) algorithms were developed. Performance metrics of the models were calculated. Models' performances were compared by using Friedman's test. Results: 8 features were selected from 851 total extracted features. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1 measure and AUC were 84%, 80%, 88%, 86%, 80%, 0.83 and 0.84, for XGBoost; 72%, 80%, 65%, 67%, 80%, 0.73 and 0.72 for RF; 66%, 53%, 76%, 67%, 53%, 0.60 and 0.65 for kNN, respectively. XGBoost model had outperformed kNN model in Friedman's test (p = 0.006). Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms with radiomics features from CTU images show promising results in classifying bladder cancer by RB1 mutation status non-invasively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.