ArticleHeliyon2022
Using the H-index as a factor in the promotion of surgical faculty.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of the research landscape of lenalidomide resistance in multiple myeloma.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Global trends and hotspots of left ventricular assist device from 1963 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Assessment of H-index and research impact amongst academic medical oncologists in Canada.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- The Use of the H-index and Research Interest Score as Indices for Rank and Promotion in Academic Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Social network analysis as a new tool to measure academic impact of physicians.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- The Top Twenty-Five Most Influential Articles in Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.HCA healthcare journal of medicine · 2025Review
- Defining quantitative rules for identifying influential researchers: Insights from mathematics domain.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Academic Impact of Hand Surgery Units Across the United Kingdom: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2022Review
- Retainment of U.S. Orthopaedic Surgeons in Academia from 2016 to 2022.JB & JS open accessArticle
- Limitations of H-index as a measure of academic influence and the importance of innovation in research: Lessons for the anesthesiology community.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Academic productivity is an important determinant for promotion. However, the measurement of academic productivity is ill-defined. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the academic productivity at the time of promotions at our institution. Methods: We reviewed the data of 33 faculty from Department of Surgery at our institution who were promoted from 2006 to 2021. Gender, academic productivity at hiring, and each promotion were obtained. Academic productivity was assessed by bibliometric indices including total number of publications and citations, and H-index, which were obtained from Web of Science. T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test and linear regression analysis were used to assess the association of H-index with length of promotion and gender. P < 0.050 were considered statistically significant. Results: The medians (interquartile ranges) of indexes at hiring, at promotions from assistant professors to associate professors, and from associate professors to full professors were 6.0 (1.5-9.5), 11.0 (9.0-18.0) and 17.0 (9.0-23.0) respectively. A simple linear regression showed significant correlation between the length of promotion to associate professors and their H-indexes at hiring. (F (1, 27) = 10.55, p = 0.003, R Conclusion: At our institution, the median H-indexes at the time of promotions from assistant professor to associate professor and from associate professor to full professor are 11.0 and 17.0. Using the H-index as an objective measure can be a useful tool to junior surgical faculty as reference for applying promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.