Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35520605›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Using the H-index as a factor in the promotion of surgical faculty.

Rongzhi Wang, Marshall Lewis, Rui Zheng-Pywell, Janet Julson, Mary Smithson, Herbert Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rongzhi WangDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Marshall LewisDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Rui Zheng-PywellDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Janet JulsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Mary SmithsonDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.
Herbert ChenDepartment of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Academic productivity is an important determinant for promotion. However, the measurement of academic productivity is ill-defined. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the academic productivity at the time of promotions at our institution. Methods: We reviewed the data of 33 faculty from Department of Surgery at our institution who were promoted from 2006 to 2021. Gender, academic productivity at hiring, and each promotion were obtained. Academic productivity was assessed by bibliometric indices including total number of publications and citations, and H-index, which were obtained from Web of Science. T-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Fisher's exact test and linear regression analysis were used to assess the association of H-index with length of promotion and gender. P < 0.050 were considered statistically significant. Results: The medians (interquartile ranges) of indexes at hiring, at promotions from assistant professors to associate professors, and from associate professors to full professors were 6.0 (1.5-9.5), 11.0 (9.0-18.0) and 17.0 (9.0-23.0) respectively. A simple linear regression showed significant correlation between the length of promotion to associate professors and their H-indexes at hiring. (F (1, 27) = 10.55, p = 0.003, R Conclusion: At our institution, the median H-indexes at the time of promotions from assistant professor to associate professor and from associate professor to full professor are 11.0 and 17.0. Using the H-index as an objective measure can be a useful tool to junior surgical faculty as reference for applying promotion.

Indexed as

Academic productivityAcademic surgeryH-indexPromotion

Identifiers

PMID35520605
PMCPMC9061622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.