ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2018
Ward calls not so scary for medical students after interprofessional simulation course: a mixed-methods cohort evaluation study.
Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stepping into the role of a doctor: an instrumental case study to explore the experiences of third-year medical students in a simulated general practice clinic.Medical education online · 2025Article
- "Asking for help is a strength"-how to promote undergraduate medical students' teamwork through simulation training and interprofessional faculty.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Changes in medical students´ and anesthesia technician trainees´ attitudes towards interprofessionality - experience from an interprofessional simulation-based course.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Article
- Caught on film: identity formation and interprofessional insight using ethnographic film.BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2020Article
- Pharmacy Students' Perspectives on Interprofessional Learning in a Simulated Patient Care Ward Environment.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An interprofessional simulation 'ward call' course-WardSim-was designed and implemented for medical, pharmacy and nursing students. We evaluated this intervention and also explored students' experiences and ideas of both the course and of ward calls. Methods: We used a mixed-methods cohort study design including survey and focus groups. Descriptive statistical analysis and general purpose thematic analysis were undertaken. Results: Survey respondents who participated in WardSim subsequently attended more ward calls and took a more active role than the control cohort, with 34% of the intervention cohort attending ward calls under indirect supervision, compared with 15% from the control cohort (P=0.004). Focus group participants indicated that the situation they were most anxious about facing in the future was attending a ward call. They reported that their collective experiences on WardSim alleviated such anxiety because it offered them experiential learning that they could then apply in real-life situations. They said they had learnt how to work effectively with other team members, to take on a leadership role, to make differential diagnoses under pressure and to effectively communicate and seek help. Conclusions: An interprofessional, simulated ward call course increased medical students' sense of preparedness for and participation in ward calls in the next calendar year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.