ArticleRSC advances2020
Non-covalent interactions between sertraline stereoisomers and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin: a quantum chemistry analysis.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thermodynamic Studies of Interactions between Sertraline Hydrochloride and Randomly Methylated β-Cyclodextrin Molecules Supported by Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy and Molecular Docking Results.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in the Analysis of Cyclodextrin Complexes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inclusion compounds formed between sertraline stereoisomers and β-cyclodextrin, and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, were analyzed by using quantum chemistry methods. The exploration of the potential energy surface was performed using chemical intuition and classical molecular mechanics. This approach delivered around 200 candidates for low energy adducts, which were optimized through the PBE0/6-31G(d,p) method, and after this process solvent effects were considered by the continuous solvent model. This analysis showed that β-cyclodextrin and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin are good trappers of sertraline, although the isomers suggested by molecular dynamics presented higher binding energies than those obtained by chemical intuition. The role of hydrogen bonds in the formation of adducts was studied using the non-covalent interactions index and the quantum theory of atoms in molecules. In this article we concluded that these interactions are present in all adducts, however, they are not important in the stabilization of these inclusion compounds. The molecular electrostatic potential indicates that Coulomb interactions could be responsible for the formation of these systems, although sophisticated solvent models must be used to confirm this conclusion, which are impractical in this case because of the sizes involved in these systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.