Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35520308›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2020

Describing the toxicity and sources and the remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil.

Dongye Teng, Kang Mao, Waqar Ali, Guomin Xu, Guopei Huang, Nabeel Khan Niazi, Xinbin Feng, Hua Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mercury accumulator plants with phytoremediation potential in a region of northwestern Colombia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BODIPY-HgAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dongye TengState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.
Kang MaoState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1777-5959
Waqar AliState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.
Guomin XuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4241-807X
Guopei HuangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.
Nabeel Khan NiaziInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad Faisalabad-38040 Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-1124
Xinbin FengState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.
Hua ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences Guiyang 550081 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is a natural element and its compounds are found as inorganic and organic forms in the environment. The different Hg forms (

Identifiers

PMID35520308
PMCPMC9054844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.