ArticleRSC advances2019
Antioxidant activity of cerium dioxide nanoparticles and nanorods in scavenging hydroxyl radicals.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the Antioxidant Capacity of Inorganic Nanoparticles: Challenges and Analytical Solutions.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enzyme-Based Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutics for Inflammatory Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Ceria nanozyme coordination with curcumin for treatment of sepsis-induced cardiac injury by inhibiting ferroptosis and inflammation.Journal of advanced research · 2024Article
- Quenching effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles on singlet oxygen: validation of the potential for reaction with multiple reactive oxygen species.Journal of clinical biochemistry and nutrition · 2023Article
- Benzo(a)pyrene and Cerium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Co-Exposure Impair Human Trophoblast Cell Stress Signaling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A novel approach for the prevention of ionizing radiation-induced bone loss using a designer multifunctional cerium oxide nanozyme.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Ceria-based coatings on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications: a literature review.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Synchrotron XRF Analysis Identifies Cerium Accumulation Colocalized with Pharyngeal Deformities in CeOEnvironmental science & technology · 2022Article
- Will the Bacteria Survive in the CeOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Phosphatase-Mimetic Nano-Stabilizer of Mast Cells for Long-Term Prevention of Allergic Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeNPs) have been shown to exhibit antioxidant capabilities, but their efficiency in scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the underlying mechanisms are not yet well understood. In this study, cerium dioxide nanoparticles (CeNPs) and nanorods (CeNRs) were found to exhibit much stronger scavenging activity than ·OH generation in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and surrogate lung fluid (SLF). The larger surface area and higher defect density of CeNRs may lead to higher ·OH scavenging activity than for CeNPs. These insights are important to understand the redox activity of cerium nanomaterials and provide clues to the role of CeNPs in biological and environmental processes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.