Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35520105›Full record

ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons

Prevalence of Group B

Oluwole Olutola Ojo, D O Awonuga, Iyabode Olabisi Florence Dedeke, Victor Ugochukwu Nwadike, Olaide Rufus Adenaya, Oluwaseyi Isaiah Odelola

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Group BMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Oluwole Olutola OjoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gbagada General Hospital, Gbagada, Lagos, Nigeria.
D O AwonugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Iyabode Olabisi Florence DedekeDepartment of Paediatrics, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Victor Ugochukwu NwadikeDepartment of Pathology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Olaide Rufus AdenayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, State Hospital, Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Oluwaseyi Isaiah OdelolaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecologist, State Hospital, Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Federal Medical Centre · NGOsun State University · NGState Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genital colonisation by group B Aim: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of GBS colonisation among pregnant women in Abeokuta, its associated sociodemographic factors, and the neonatal outcome among exposed babies. Design: Longitudinal cohort study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Ogun State. Methodology: One hundred sixty pregnant women presenting for routine antenatal care between 35 and 41 weeks were recruited consecutively. Swabs were taken from the vagina and then the rectum using a single swab. The samples were processed at the hospital's Medical Microbiology Laboratory using standard microbiological methods. Babies whose mothers were positive had their bodies swabbed and the samples sent for GBS isolates. They were also screened for early-onset neonatal sepsis with C-reactive protein. Results: Prevalence of GBS vaginal colonisation was 4.3%. There was no significant association between GBS colonisation status and age, level of education, or occupation; however, women of parity ≤1 had significantly higher prevalence of GBS colonisation than those of parity ≥2. There was no incidence of GBS infection observed in the babies. The GBS isolates were 100% sensitive to cefuroxime and 83.3% resistant to ampicillin. Conclusion: The prevalence of GBS is low in our environment. The organisms were highly sensitive to cefuroxime, erythromycin, and ceftriaxone. Routine screening of all pregnant women may be unnecessary. However, women at risk of GBS who present in labour without a recent GBS screening should be offered intrapartum prophylactic cefuroxime.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial susceptibilityGBS colonisationneonatal outcomepregnant women

Identifiers

PMID35520105
PMCPMC9063531
OpenAlexW4206538808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.