ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Spider-Inspired HCCapture: Beware That What You Are Writing on Mobile Devices Is Becoming Prey for Spiders.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On mobile devices, the most important input interface is touchscreen, which can transmit a large amount of sensitive information. Many researchers have proven that sensors can be used as side channels to leak touchscreen interactive information. The research of information leakage in the restricted area has been relatively mature, but in the unrestricted area, still there are two issues to be solved urgently: chirography difference and posture variation. We learn from the way spiders perceive prey through the subtle vibrations of their webs; an unrestricted-area handwriting information speculation framework, called spider-inspired handwriting character capture (spider-inspired HCCapture), is designed. Spider-inspired HCCapture exploits the motion sensor as the side-channel and uses the neural network algorithm to train the recognition model. To alleviate the impact of different handwriting habits, we utilize the generality patterns of characters rather than the patterns of raw sensor signals. Furthermore, each character is disassembled into basic strokes, which are used as recognition features. We also proposed a user-independent posture-aware approach to detect the user's handwriting posture to select a suitable one from some pretrained models for speculation. In addition, the Markov model is introduced into spider-inspired HCCapture, which is used as an enhancement feature when there is a correlation between adjacent characters. In conclusion, spider-inspired HCCapture completes the handwritten character speculation attack without obtaining the victim's information in advance. The experimental results show that the accuracy of spider-inspired HCCapture reaches 96.1%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.