Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35519403›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2019

Green process to regenerate keratin from feathers with an aqueous deep eutectic solvent.

Emmi-Maria Nuutinen, Pia Willberg-Keyriläinen, Tommi Virtanen, Alice Mija, Lauri Kuutti, Raija Lantto, Anna-Stiina Jääskeläinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmi-Maria NuutinenSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-0914
Pia Willberg-KeyriläinenSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.
Tommi VirtanenSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.
Alice MijaUniversité Côte d'Azur, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Institut de Chimie de Nice UMR CNRS 7272 06108 Nice Cedex 02 France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-5956
Lauri KuuttiSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.
Raija LanttoSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.
Anna-Stiina JääskeläinenSolutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 2 FI-02044 Espoo Finland emmi.nuutinen@vtt.fi +358406817126.
Espoo Music Institute · FIUniversité Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poultry feathers, a source of keratin, are a significant side stream from the food industry, for which valorization is essential considering the circular economy aspects. For this, ecofriendly processes are the tools that allow the easy and feasible transformation of the feathers. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are generally considered as inexpensive, relatively simple, mild and environmentally friendly solvents which can dissolve proteins from protein-rich biomasses. In this work, feathers were processed with an aqueous DES to produce a uniform keratin feedstock. The proposed DES is composed of non-toxic sodium acetate and urea, with a small amount of water. After the DES treatment, water was used to dilute the DES components and regenerate the dissolved keratin. The processing conditions were optimized in terms of keratin yield and properties by varying the dissolution time from 2 h to 24 h and temperature from 80 °C to 100 °C. The yield of regenerated keratin was followed at different sodium acetate-urea molar ratios, and compared to the treatment performed with choline chloride-urea or 8 M urea as reference solvents. Sodium acetate-urea in the molar ratio of 1 : 2 at 100 °C and with 6 h dissolution time dissolved 86% of the feathers with a regenerated keratin yield of 45%. In the characterization of regenerated keratin, it was found that when the dissolution temperature was higher and the dissolution time longer, the disulfide and total sulfur content of feather keratin decreased, the range of molecular weights became wider, and some of the ordered secondary structure and crystallinity were lost.

Identifiers

PMID35519403
PMCPMC9065387
OpenAlexW2954831733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.