Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35519343›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2019

An innovative bioresorbable gelatin based 3D scaffold that maintains the stemness of adipose tissue derived stem cells and the plasticity of differentiated neurons.

Catherine Ann Martin, Subathra Radhakrishnan, Sakthivel Nagarajan, Shanthini Muthukoori, J M Meseguer Dueñas, José Luis Gómez Ribelles, Baddrireddi Subhadra Lakshmi, Nivethaa E A K, José Antonio Gómez-Tejedor, Mettu Srinivas Reddy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrative Adipogenic Engineering of Cultured Fat for Cell Based Meat.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Catherine Ann MartinCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University Chennai India kalkura@yahoo.com kalkurasn@annauniv.edu.
Subathra RadhakrishnanNational Foundation for Liver Research, Global Hospitals & Health City Chennai India.
Sakthivel NagarajanCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University Chennai India kalkura@yahoo.com kalkurasn@annauniv.edu.
Shanthini MuthukooriCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University Chennai India kalkura@yahoo.com kalkurasn@annauniv.edu.
J M Meseguer DueñasCenter for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering (CBIT), Universitat Politècnica de València Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia Spain.
José Luis Gómez RibellesCenter for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering (CBIT), Universitat Politècnica de València Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia Spain.
Baddrireddi Subhadra LakshmiDepartment of Biotechnology, Anna University Chennai India.
Nivethaa E A KCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University Chennai India kalkura@yahoo.com kalkurasn@annauniv.edu.
José Antonio Gómez-TejedorCenter for Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering (CBIT), Universitat Politècnica de València Camino de Vera s/n. 46022 Valencia Spain.
Mettu Srinivas ReddyNational Foundation for Liver Research, Global Hospitals & Health City Chennai India.
Shanmugaapriya SellathambyDepartment of Biomedicine, Bharathidasan University India.
Mohamed RelaNational Foundation for Liver Research, Global Hospitals & Health City Chennai India.
Narayana Kalkura SubbarayaCrystal Growth Centre, Anna University Chennai India kalkura@yahoo.com kalkurasn@annauniv.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5777-2907
Anna University, Chennai · INFoundation for Liver Research · GBBioengineering (Switzerland) · CHBharathidasan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural tissue engineering aims at producing a simulated environment using a matrix that is suitable to grow specialized neurons/glial cells pertaining to CNS/PNS which replace damaged or lost tissues. The primary goal of this study is to design a compatible scaffold that supports the development of neural-lineage cells which aids in neural regeneration. The fabricated, freeze-dried scaffolds consisted of biocompatible, natural and synthetic polymers: gelatin and polyvinyl pyrrolidone. Physiochemical characterization was carried out using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) imaging. The 3D construct retains good swelling proficiency and holds the integrated structure that supports cell adhesion and proliferation. The composite of PVP-gelatin is blended in such a way that it matches the mechanical strength of the brain tissue. The cytocompatibility analysis shows that the scaffolds are compatible and permissible for the growth of both stem cells as well as differentiated neurons. A change in the ratios of the scaffold components resulted in varied sizes of pores giving diverse surface morphology, greatly influencing the properties of the neurons. However, there is no change in stem cell properties. Different types of neurons are characterized by the type of gene associated with the neurotransmitter secreted by them. The change in the neuron properties could be attributed to neuroplasticity. The plasticity of the neurons was analyzed using quantitative gene expression studies. It has been observed that the gelatin-rich construct supports the prolonged proliferation of stem cells and multiple neurons along with their plasticity.

Identifiers

PMID35519343
PMCPMC9064131
OpenAlexW2944394493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.