ArticleRSC advances2019
Antibiotic removal by agricultural waste biochars with different forms of iron oxide.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic insights into textile effluent remediation using acid-treated sugarcane peel.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental study and theoretical modelling based on DFT of the elimination of ceftriaxone by an activated carbon synthesized from grape seeds waste.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Agrowaste-carbon and carbon-based nanocomposites for endocrine disruptive cationic dyes removal: A critical review.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Properties and Possibilities of Using Biochar Composites Made on the Basis of Biomass and Waste Residues Ferryferrohydrosol Sorbent.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A combination of QTL mapping and genome-wide association study revealed the key gene for husk number in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024Article
- Adsorptive removal of antibiotic pollutants from wastewater using biomass/biochar-based adsorbents.RSC advances · 2023Review
- Article
- One-Step Synthesis of a Mn-Doped FeACS omega · 2022Article
- Designing chitosan based magnetic beads with conocarpus waste-derived biochar for efficient sulfathiazole removal from contaminated water.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Activated Olive Stones as a Low-Cost and Environmentally Friendly Adsorbent for Removing Cephalosporin C from Aqueous Solutions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Review
- Cysteine chemical modification for surface regulation of biochar and its application for polymetallic adsorption from aqueous solutions.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Purification of Aqueous Media by Biochars: Feedstock Type Effect on Silver Nanoparticles Removal.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollution by antibiotics has become a serious threat to public health. In this study, agricultural waste, corn husk, in the form of biochar, was utilized for antibiotic removal from wastewater. Two kinds of iron-loaded biochars, impregnation-pyrolysis biochar (IP) and pyrolysis-impregnation biochar (PI), were synthesized to adsorb the typical antibiotics tetracycline (TC) and levofloxacin (LEV). PI contained amorphous hydrated iron oxide, whereas the major component of IP was γ-Fe
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.