ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Generalized figure of merit for plasmonic dip measurement-based surface plasmon resonance sensors.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterial-Enabled Fiber-Optic SPR Biosensor for Continuous and Noninvasive Body Fluid Monitoring:Progress and Prospects.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Introduction to the feature issue: Advances in Optical Biosensors for Biomedical Applications.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Sensing Mechanisms of Rough Plasmonic Surfaces for Protein Binding of Surface Plasmon Resonance Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a theoretical framework to analyze quantitative sensing performance parameters, including sensitivity, full width at half maximum, plasmonic dip position, and figure of merits for different surface plasmon operating conditions for a Kretschmann configuration. Several definitions and expressions of the figure of merit have been reported in the literature. Moreover, the optimal operating conditions for each figure of merit are, in fact, different. In addition, there is still no direct figure of merit comparison between different expressions and definitions to identify which definition provides a more accurate performance prediction. Here shot-noise model and Monte Carlo simulation mimicking the noise behavior in SPR experiments have been applied to quantify standard deviation in the SPR plasmonic dip measurements to evaluate the performance responses of the figure of merits. Here, we propose and formulate a generalized figure of merit definition providing a good performance estimation to the detection limit. The measurement parameters employed in the figure of merit formulation are identified by principal component analysis and machine learning. We also show that the proposed figure of merit can provide a good estimation for the surface plasmon resonance performance of plasmonic materials, including gold and aluminum, with no need for a resource-demanding computation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.