Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35519068›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2020

Recent advances and future perspectives of sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses: a review.

Kalim Deshmukh, Tomáš Kovářík, Tomáš Křenek, Denitsa Docheva, Theresia Stich, Josef Pola

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Current advancements in nanotechnology for stem cells.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kalim DeshmukhNew Technologies - Research Center, University of West Bohemia Plzeň 30100 Czech Republic deshmukh@ntc.zcu.cz +420-775942198.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5010-9096
Tomáš KováříkNew Technologies - Research Center, University of West Bohemia Plzeň 30100 Czech Republic deshmukh@ntc.zcu.cz +420-775942198.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4838-4069
Tomáš KřenekNew Technologies - Research Center, University of West Bohemia Plzeň 30100 Czech Republic deshmukh@ntc.zcu.cz +420-775942198.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-0154
Denitsa DochevaExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Regensburg Medical Centre 93042 Regensburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7588-1290
Theresia StichExperimental Trauma Surgery, Department of Trauma Surgery, University Regensburg Medical Centre 93042 Regensburg Germany.
Josef PolaNew Technologies - Research Center, University of West Bohemia Plzeň 30100 Czech Republic deshmukh@ntc.zcu.cz +420-775942198.
University of West Bohemia in Pilsen · CZUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses have drawn worldwide attention by virtue of the convenience and flexibility of this versatile synthesis method. In this review, the recent advances in sol-gel processed porous bioactive glasses in biomedical fields, especially for bone tissue regeneration applications have been comprehensively reviewed. Generally, it is envisaged that the morphology and chemical compositions of sol-gel derived porous bioactive glasses significantly affect their biological properties. Therefore, the controlled synthesis of these porous glasses is critical to their effective use in the biomedical fields. With this context, the first part of the review briefly describes the fundamentals of the sol-gel technique. In the subsequent section, different approaches frequently used for the sol-gel synthesis of porous glasses such as microemulsion and acid-catalyzed based synthesis have been reviewed. In the later part of the review, different types of sol-gel derived bioactive glasses namely silica, phosphate and silica-titania based glasses along with organic-inorganic hybrids materials have been discussed. The review also discusses the chemical, surface, mechanical and biological properties and further highlights the strategies to control the pore structure, shape, size and compositions of sol-gel derived bioactive glasses. Finally, the review provides a detailed discussion about the bone tissue regeneration application of different types of sol-gel derived bioactive glasses and presents future research perspectives.

Identifiers

PMID35519068
PMCPMC9056785
OpenAlexW3084505240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.