Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35518826›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2022

Management dilemmas in restarting anticoagulation after gastrointestinal bleeding.

Hanish Jain, Garima Singh, Viren Kaul, Harvir Singh Gambhir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanish JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Garima SinghDepartment of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Viren KaulDepartment of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Harvir Singh GambhirDepartment of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic anticoagulants are widely prescribed to prevent and treat thromboembolism, among other indications. A common complication of using these agents is gastrointestinal bleeding. While early resumption of anticoagulants after the bleeding has resolved can increase the risk of rebleeding, delayed resumption puts the patient at increased risk of thromboembolic events and mortality. There is limited data on this topic to guide clinicians on resuming anticoagulation after hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding and to educate patients regarding the subsequent risks of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. The optimal time to resume anticoagulation is also unknown. This review summarizes the existing literature and available data on the commonly encountered dilemma of restarting anticoagulation therapy after hospitalization for gastrointestinal bleeding.

Indexed as

Anticoagulantsgastrointestinal bleedingmortalitythromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID35518826
PMCPMC9037438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.