Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35518591›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

A decoupler-free simple paper microchip capillary electrophoresis device for simultaneous detection of dopamine, epinephrine and serotonin.

Appan Roychoudhury, Kevin Antony Francis, Jay Patel, Sandeep Kumar Jha, Suddhasatwa Basu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advancement of microchip electrophoresis coupled with capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection-from design to application (2018-2024).Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Electrokinetic Motion of Neurotransmitter Ions through a 1.01 nm Diameter Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Appan RoychoudhuryCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 India.
Kevin Antony FrancisCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 India.
Jay PatelDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology Nagpur 440010 India.
Sandeep Kumar JhaCentre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-5992
Suddhasatwa BasuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi Hauz Khas New Delhi 110016 India sbasu@iitd.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-2370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a new and simplified configuration for capillary electrophoresis-amperometric detection (CE-AD) using a paper microfluidic chip incorporating inexpensive wax printing and screen printing based methods and then used for electrophoretic separation and simultaneous in-channel amperometric detection of three clinically relevant neurochemicals in a single run without using any decouplers. Detection of neurochemicals

Identifiers

PMID35518591
PMCPMC9055240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.