ArticleHardwareX2022
Mostly 3D printed chemical synthesis robot.
Article in HardwareX, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI and automation: democratizing automation and the evolution towards true AI-autonomous robotics.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Practical electronics and robotics for chemists.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- The Perry project: A versatile low-cost syringe pump for dispensing in automated synthesis systems.HardwareX · 2024Article
- Open source scientific bottle roller.HardwareX · 2023Article
- AC/off-grid photovoltaic powered open-source ball mill.HardwareX · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thanks to the current technology derived from the open-source world of 3D printers, it is conceivable to automate some laboratory activities remotely. In fact, simple operations, such as mixing liquids or solutions, stirring, heating and sampling to control the reaction course can be easily implemented. The idea of automating the chemical laboratory would have immediate advantages, for example in terms of safety. The operators will be able to remotely control the machines and in case of handling dangerous material or accidents, there would only be damage to the hardware components. Many of the process parameters can also be read with low-cost probes and devices that can be easily interfaced with microprocessors. We include for example, but not limited to, temperature, pH, redox potential, electrochemical measurements in general or the use of probes for specific analytes. In this work we wish to present our liquid sampling station able to control up to 6 reagents and a temperature controlled chemical reactor. The workstation can be used graphically with an intuitive interface written in Python. The control program is structured to have modularity and contains a built-in programming language to control the interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.