ArticleRSC advances2019
Novel fabrication of porous titanium by a resin-impregnated titanium substitution technique for bone reconstruction.
Article in RSC advances, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fabrication and Characterization of Bioactive Gelatin-Alginate-Bioactive Glass Composite Coatings on Porous Titanium Substrates.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- The development of novel bioactive porous titanium as a bone reconstruction material.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Comparative Study of Surface Modification Treatment for Porous Titanium.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchArticle
- Osseointegration Aspects of Implants at the Bone Reconstruction Site by a Novel Porous Titanium Scaffold.Journal of oral & maxillofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a novel porous titanium material with superior mechanical strength and osteoconduction for bone reconstruction. Porous titanium samples were fabricated by titanium-slurry impregnate to prepare urethane forms with several porosities (high-porosity; 92%, middle-porosity; 85% and low-porosity; 65%). Porous HA (mean porosity; 75.3%) was used as a control. To evaluate the characteristics of these materials, we performed porosity measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), three-point bending testing, and cell proliferation assays. To evaluate the osteoconduction ability, porous titanium was placed into the femurs of rabbits and histological and histomorphometric evaluations were performed after 3 weeks. In SEM images, porous three-dimensional structures were observed in all samples. The bending strength significantly increased as porosity increased (Ti-65 > Ti-85 > porous HA > Ti-92,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.