ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2017
Older people's views and experiences of engagement in standardised patient simulation.
Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing lived experience in health professions simulation-based education: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Article
- Capturing and cultivating the simulated patient/participant (SP) experience: a qualitative study exploring how the perspectives of SPs can inform the co-production of an orientation resource guide.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Emotional, Cognitive, and Logistical Factors Influencing Simulated Patient Performance in Simulation-Based Education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
- Collaborative framework for working with older simulated participants (SP).BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021Article
- "Please let me know when I do not realize it myself": a qualitative analysis of senior simulated patients' experiences.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The last two decades have witnessed initiatives aimed at improving the care of older people, including educating nurses so that they are equipped with the skills to care for older people with frailty and complex multimorbidities. It has been suggested that involvement of older service users in nurse education can facilitate the development of nurses' caring skills by promoting understanding of the reality of older people's situations. One method of involving older service users is standardised patient simulation (SPS). While some recent studies have acknowledged the importance of considering standardised patients' experiences and perceptions of simulation, to date few have focused specifically on the experiences of older people. Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected via focus groups, whereby older people were invited to discuss their views and experiences of involvement in SPS. Data were analysed using open coding. Findings: Four themes emerged from the data, demonstrating that involving older people in SPS may be beneficial for their well-being. The four themes were: 'using personal experiences to improve care', 'having a sense of purpose', 'preparation and support for SPS' and 'feeling appreciated'. Discussion: While most participants reported that they enjoyed the SPS activities, engagement appeared to have had a much deeper significance for them. Many participants' responses suggested that involvement assisted them to 'make sense' of their experiences of illness and healthcare, and also gave a sense of purpose, of belonging and of being valued. Conclusion: Findings support the need for nurse educators to consider developing SPS programmes that involve older people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.