Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35517835›Full record

ArticleBMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning2017

Older people's views and experiences of engagement in standardised patient simulation.

Juliana Thompson, Sue Tiplady, Anne Hutchinson, Glenda Cook, Barbara Harrington

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Harnessing lived experience in health professions simulation-based education: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Collaborative framework for working with older simulated participants (SP).BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana ThompsonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sue TipladyDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Anne HutchinsonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Glenda CookDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Barbara HarringtonDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Northumbria University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The last two decades have witnessed initiatives aimed at improving the care of older people, including educating nurses so that they are equipped with the skills to care for older people with frailty and complex multimorbidities. It has been suggested that involvement of older service users in nurse education can facilitate the development of nurses' caring skills by promoting understanding of the reality of older people's situations. One method of involving older service users is standardised patient simulation (SPS). While some recent studies have acknowledged the importance of considering standardised patients' experiences and perceptions of simulation, to date few have focused specifically on the experiences of older people. Methods: In this qualitative study, data were collected via focus groups, whereby older people were invited to discuss their views and experiences of involvement in SPS. Data were analysed using open coding. Findings: Four themes emerged from the data, demonstrating that involving older people in SPS may be beneficial for their well-being. The four themes were: 'using personal experiences to improve care', 'having a sense of purpose', 'preparation and support for SPS' and 'feeling appreciated'. Discussion: While most participants reported that they enjoyed the SPS activities, engagement appeared to have had a much deeper significance for them. Many participants' responses suggested that involvement assisted them to 'make sense' of their experiences of illness and healthcare, and also gave a sense of purpose, of belonging and of being valued. Conclusion: Findings support the need for nurse educators to consider developing SPS programmes that involve older people.

Indexed as

nurseolder peoplequalitativesimulationStandardised patient

Identifiers

PMID35517835
PMCPMC8936994
OpenAlexW2613090161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.