ArticleRSC advances2020
Enzyme immobilization inside the porous wood structure: a natural scaffold for continuous-flow biocatalysis.
Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pyrazine derivative synthesis in a continuous-flow system: a green synthesis of pyrazinamide from pyrazine esters and amines catalyzed by Lipozyme® TL IM fromRSC advances · 2024Article
- Magnetic Nanoparticle Support with an Ultra-Thin Chitosan Layer Preserves the Catalytic Activity of the Immobilized Glucose Oxidase.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Preparation and characterization of permeability and mechanical properties of three-dimensional porous stainless steel.RSC advances · 2022Article
- Laccase-mediated synthesis of bioactive natural products and their analogues.RSC chemical biology · 2022Review
- The Accessibility of the Cell Wall in Scots Pine (ACS omega · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymes are often immobilized on solid supports to enable their recovery from reaction solutions, facilitate their reuse and hence increase cost-effectiveness in their application. Immobilized enzymes may even be used for flow-through applications in continuous processes. However, the synthesis of traditional immobilization scaffolds and immobilization techniques lack sustainability as they are often based on fuel-based materials and tedious synthesis- and immobilization approaches. Here, we present the natural material wood as a green alternative for enzyme immobilization. Its natural structure provides a mechanically stable porous scaffold with a high inner surface area that allows for directional flow-through of liquids. Enzymes were immobilized by nanoparticle-mediated adsorption, a simple, versatile and completely water-based process. The resulting wood-enzyme hybrids were intensely investigated for the model enzyme laccase. Reaction kinetics, as well as catalytic activities at various pH-values, temperatures, and ionic strengths were determined. The wood-enzyme hybrids could quickly and completely be removed from the reaction solution. Hence, they allow for multifold reusability. We show a series of 25 consecutive reaction cycles with a remaining activity in the last cycle of 90% of the maximal activity. Moreover, the anisotropic porosity of wood enabled the application of the hybrid material as a biocatalytic flow-through reactor. Flow-rate dependent productivity of a single-enzyme reaction was determined. Moreover, we show a two-step reaction cascade in continuous flow by the immobilization of the enzymes glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase. Therefore, the natural material wood proved to be a promising material for application in continuous-flow biocatalysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.