Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35517454›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

QuEChERS pretreatment combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for determination of aristolochic acids I and II in Chinese herbal patent medicines.

Jinghe Zhang, Yinan Wang, Jing Sun, Guowei Zhou, Xiaojie Jiang, Xikui Wang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinghe ZhangKey Laboratory of Fine Chemicals in Universities of Shandong, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250100 China wangyn@qlu.edu.cn +86-531-89631696.
Yinan WangKey Laboratory of Fine Chemicals in Universities of Shandong, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250100 China wangyn@qlu.edu.cn +86-531-89631696.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-6470
Jing SunSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250353 China.
Guowei ZhouKey Laboratory of Fine Chemicals in Universities of Shandong, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250100 China wangyn@qlu.edu.cn +86-531-89631696.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7023-6225
Xiaojie JiangKey Laboratory of Fine Chemicals in Universities of Shandong, School of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250100 China wangyn@qlu.edu.cn +86-531-89631696.
Xikui WangSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences) Jinan 250353 China.
Qilu University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aristolochic acid I and II (AA I and II), a kind of nephrotoxic and carcinogenic compound, are widely added in Chinese herbal patent medicines though they have been banned due to their toxicity. However, the traditional sample pre-treatment combined with the LC-MS analysis system is not effective to determine AAs in such complicated patent medicines. The QuEChERS pretreatment method possesses some merits such as being quick and effective. In this work, the modified QuEChERS method was first used to determine AA I and II in Chinese herbal patent medicines combined with the HPLC-MS/MS analysis system. Extraction and removal of target analytes from powder, tablet, and capsule samples were conducted using the modified QuEChERS pretreatment. The liquid extracts of Chinese herbal patent medicines could be analyzed directly. The method optimization results show that average recoveries ranged from 96.6% to 110.3% with relative standard deviations ranging from 4.2% to 13.0%. The quantization limits of the three selected matrices are estimated as follows (AA I/II): 2.8/6.5 ng mL

Identifiers

PMID35517454
PMCPMC9055279
OpenAlexW3039578162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.