Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516841›Full record

ArticleJournal of toxicologic pathology2022

Deep learning-based image-analysis algorithm for classification and quantification of multiple histopathological lesions in rat liver.

Taishi Shimazaki, Ameya Deshpande, Anindya Hajra, Tijo Thomas, Kyotaka Muta, Naohito Yamada, Yuzo Yasui, Toshiyuki Shoda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of toxicologic pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Deep Learning-based Modeling for Preclinical Drug Safety Assessment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Taishi ShimazakiToxicology Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc., 1-13-2 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Ameya DeshpandeAIRA Matrix Private Limited, Dosti Pinnacle, 801, Rd Number 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane, Maharashtra 400604, India.
Anindya HajraAIRA Matrix Private Limited, Dosti Pinnacle, 801, Rd Number 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane, Maharashtra 400604, India.
Tijo ThomasAIRA Matrix Private Limited, Dosti Pinnacle, 801, Rd Number 22, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane, Maharashtra 400604, India.
Kyotaka MutaToxicology Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc., 1-13-2 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Naohito YamadaToxicology Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc., 1-13-2 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Yuzo YasuiToxicology Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc., 1-13-2 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Toshiyuki ShodaToxicology Research Laboratories, Central Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Japan Tobacco Inc., 1-13-2 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Japan Tobacco (Japan) · JPMatrix Research (United States) · USJapan Tobacco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis is increasingly being used for preclinical safety-assessment studies in the pharmaceutical industry. In this paper, we present an AI-based solution for preclinical toxicology studies. We trained a set of algorithms to learn and quantify multiple typical histopathological findings in whole slide images (WSIs) of the livers of young Sprague Dawley rats by using a U-Net-based deep learning network. The trained algorithms were validated using 255 liver WSIs to detect, classify, and quantify seven types of histopathological findings (including vacuolation, bile duct hyperplasia, and single-cell necrosis) in the liver. The algorithms showed consistently good performance in detecting abnormal areas. Approximately 75% of all specimens could be classified as true positive or true negative. In general, findings with clear boundaries with the surrounding normal structures, such as vacuolation and single-cell necrosis, were accurately detected with high statistical scores. The results of quantitative analyses and classification of the diagnosis based on the threshold values between "no findings" and "abnormal findings" correlated well with diagnoses made by professional pathologists. However, the scores for findings ambiguous boundaries, such as hepatocellular hypertrophy, were poor. These results suggest that deep learning-based algorithms can detect, classify, and quantify multiple findings simultaneously on rat liver WSIs. Thus, it can be a useful supportive tool for a histopathological evaluation, especially for primary screening in rat toxicity studies.

Indexed as

digital pathologyhepatotoxicitylesion detection and quantificationmachine learningpharmaceutical developmenttoxicity study

Identifiers

PMID35516841
PMCPMC9018404
OpenAlexW3217301867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.