ReviewCardiac failure review2022
Mechanical Circulatory Support for Right Ventricular Failure.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Navigating isolated tricuspid regurgitation: A practical guide to perioperative and periprocedural management.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Evaluation and Management of Sepsis in Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2025Review
- Right Heart Failure in Critical and Chronic Care: Current Concepts, Challenges and Mechanical Support Strategies.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current insights on temporary mechanical circulatory support in adults with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Balloon atrial septostomy: a weapon to challenge right heart failure after cardiac surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Medical and Mechanical Circulatory Support of the Failing Right Ventricle.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Tetralogy of Fallot Across the Lifespan: A Focus on the Right Ventricle.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2023Review
- [Treatment of cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular involvement].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Article
- Mechanical Circulatory Support and Critical Care Management of High-Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Interventional cardiology clinics · 2023Review
- Keep the Right in Mind-A Focused Approach to Right Ventricle-Predominant Cardiogenic Shock.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Right ventricular (RV) failure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with in-hospital mortality rates estimated as high as 70-75%. RV failure may occur following cardiac surgery in conjunction with left ventricular failure, or may be isolated in certain circumstances, such as inferior MI with RV infarction, pulmonary embolism or following left ventricular assist device placement. Medical management includes volume optimisation and inotropic and vasopressor support, and a subset of patients may benefit from mechanical circulatory support for persistent RV failure. Increasingly, percutaneous and surgical mechanical support devices are being used for RV failure. Devices for isolated RV support include percutaneous options, such as micro-axial flow pumps and extracorporeal centrifugal flow RV assist devices, surgically implanted RV assist devices and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In this review, the authors discuss the indications, candidate selection, strategies and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support for RV failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.