Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516726›Full record

ReviewJTO clinical and research reports2022

The Predictive and Prognostic Nature of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Aaron S Mansfield, Rebecca J Brown, Cormac Sammon, Melinda J Daumont, Mike McKenna, Jenine K Sanzari, Patrick M Forde

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JTO clinical and research reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Amivantamab Induces Immune-Mediated Cytotoxicity in Mesothelioma Through EGFR and MET Engagement.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Immunotherapy advances in pleural mesothelioma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Contemporary management of mesothelioma.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aaron S MansfieldDivision of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rebecca J BrownPHMR Ltd., Berkeley Works, London, United Kingdom.
Cormac SammonPHMR Ltd., Berkeley Works, London, United Kingdom.
Melinda J DaumontBristol-Myers Squibb, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Mike McKennaHealth Outcomes Solutions Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
Jenine K SanzariBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, New Jersey.
Patrick M FordeBloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
CJR Propulsion (United Kingdom) · GBBloomberg (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BEBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Given the emergence of combination of programmed cell death protein-1 and CTLA4 pathway blockade as effective treatment options in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), there is interest in the extent to which programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may be prognostic of clinical outcomes and predictive of response to anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapies. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases were searched until November 4, 2020. English-language randomized trials and observational studies that reported clinical outcomes and PD-L1 expression in adult patients (>18 or >20 y) with MPM were included. Forest plots were used to descriptively summarize clinical outcome data across studies. Results: A total of 29 publications were identified providing data on the research question. Among the studies in which anti-PD-(L)1 therapies were not specified to have been used, 63% (10 of 16) found patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 (typically >1%) to have poorer survival than those with tumors expressing lower levels of PD-L1. Among the studies in which anti-PD-(L)1 therapies were used, 83% (five of six) did not reveal an association between survival and PD-L1 tumor expression. The single study directly comparing outcomes between those treated and untreated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies across different PD-L1 cutoffs did not identify any differences between the groups. Conclusions: The quality and consistency of the existing evidence base are currently insufficient to draw conclusions regarding a prognostic or predictive role of PD-L1 in MPM. Furthermore, high-quality studies on this topic are required to support the use of PD-L1 as a biomarker in MPM.

Indexed as

BiomarkerMesotheliomaPD-L1PredictivePrognostic

Identifiers

PMID35516726
PMCPMC9062484
OpenAlexW4220893473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.