ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
Utility of reticulocyte indices in the diagnosis of pancytopenia.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating primary bone marrow failure syndromes in children: a retrospective analysis of early clinical and laboratory features.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Enhancing diagnostic accuracy for iron deficiency in pregnant women through mean reticulocyte volume.Asia Pacific journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pancytopenia is a hematological condition in which there is a reduction in all three cell lines of blood. This study aims to evaluate the utility of reticulocyte indices such as reticulocyte % (retic %), immature reticulocyte fraction (IRF), and mean reticulocyte volume (MRV) in identifying the cause of pancytopenia. Materials and Methods: Reticulocyte indices were measured by an automated coulter. These values were then correlated with relevant biochemical and bone marrow results and cases were stratified into different etiological groups. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed and various cut-off values were derived based on the reticulocyte indices. ROC was repeated to further classify cut-off values at every level to help formulate a diagnostic algorithm. Results: A total of 154 cases of pancytopenia were obtained. Ages ranged from 7 months to 87 years with a mean of 42, the male:female ratio was 1.08:1. The majority of the cases were megaloblastic anemias in which the cut-off values for retic % was <0.91 with a sensitivity of 78.1% and specificity of 70%, IRF was 0.45 with a sensitivity of 76.7% and specificity of 64%, and MRV was >121.8 fl with a sensitivity of 83.6% and specificity of 80%. The values on ROC could segregate nutritional from nonnutritional causes. The IRF and MRV also helped to differentiate megaloblastic anemia from dual deficiency anemia. Conclusion: Reticulocyte indices help identify the cause of pancytopenia. They can segregate nutritional anemia from other causes of pancytopenia allowing presumptive treatment to be initiated and may obviate invasive procedures such as bone marrow examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.