ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2022
A case of "very" very late stent thrombosis: More than 12 years after DES.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced Reendothelialization and Thrombosis Prevention with a New Drug-Eluting Stent.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Article
- Modification of 316L Stainless Steel, Nickel Titanium, and Cobalt Chromium Surfaces by Irreversible Immobilization of Fibronectin: Towards Improving the Coronary Stent Biocompatibility.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rare but possibly catastrophic consequence of drug-eluting stents (DES) is very late stent thrombosis. We report a case of 74-year-old male who sustained a ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) 12 years after initial Paclitaxel eluting stent implantation (PES). This is the longest time between stent placement and the development of an acute coronary event due to very late stent thrombosis that we are aware of (VLST). The implications for prognosis and therapy are significant because they highlight the uncertainty around the recommended duration of antiplatelet medication in patients with DES. Clinicians face challenges in treating those patients particularly when competing medical conditions demand the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. VLST is concerning since the underlying pathophysiology is unknown, and the best preventive treatments and duration of antiplatelet medication after stent implantation are unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.