Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516598›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2020

3D printing of biomass-derived composites: application and characterization approaches.

Anqi Ji, Shuyang Zhang, Samarthya Bhagia, Chang Geun Yoo, Arthur J Ragauskas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anqi JiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse NY 13210 USA cyoo05@esf.edu +1-315-470-6516.
Shuyang ZhangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 37996 USA aragausk@utk.edu +1-865-974-2042.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-3046
Samarthya BhagiaBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9495-1880
Chang Geun YooDepartment of Chemical Engineering, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse NY 13210 USA cyoo05@esf.edu +1-315-470-6516.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6179-2414
Arthur J RagauskasDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 37996 USA aragausk@utk.edu +1-865-974-2042.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3536-554X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an additive manufacturing technique with a wide range of 3D structure fabrication and minimal waste generation. Recently, lignocellulosic biomass and its derivatives have been used in 3D printing due to their renewable nature and sustainability. This review provides a summary of the development of different types of biomass and its components such as cellulose and lignin in 3D printing, brief data analysis and introduction to characterization methods of the 3D printed composites. Mechanical properties such as tensile properties, Izod impact properties, and flexural properties, thermal properties and morphological properties of 3D-printed composites are discussed. In addition, other available characterization methods of 3D-printed composites are reported. The future direction of biomass and its derivatives in the field of 3D printing is also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID35516598
PMCPMC9054612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.