Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516524›Full record

ArticleEcological indicators2022

A biological condition gradient for Caribbean coral reefs: Part II. Numeric rules using sessile benthic organisms.

Deborah L Santavy, Susan K Jackson, Benjamin Jessup, Christina Horstmann, Caroline Rogers, Ernesto Weil, Alina Szmant, David Cuevas Miranda, Brian K Walker, Christopher Jeffrey and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological indicators, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reef structure of the Florida Reef Tract for the period 2005-2020.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2023
    Article
  5. Valuing improvements in the ecological integrity of local and regional waters using the biological condition gradient.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah L SantavyUS Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Center for Environmental, Measurement and Modeling (CEMM), Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division (GEMMD), Gulf Breeze, FL, United States.
Susan K JacksonUS EPA, Office of Water (OW), Washington, DC, United States.
Benjamin JessupTetra Tech, Inc., Montpelier, VT, United States.
Christina HorstmannOak Ridge Institute for Science Education Participant at US EPA, ORD, CEMM, GEMMD, Gulf Breeze, FL, United States.
Caroline RogersU.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, St. John, USVI, United States.
Ernesto WeilDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, PR, United States.
Alina SzmantUniversity of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC, United States.
David Cuevas MirandaUS EPA, Region 2, Caribbean Marine Protection Division, Guaynabo, PR, United States.
Brian K WalkerNova Southeastern University Oceanographic Center, Dania, FL, United States.
Christopher JeffreyCSS-Inc., Fairfax, VA, Under Contract to NOAA, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Marine Spatial Ecology Division, Biogeography Branch, Silver Spring, MD, United States.
David BallantineSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Wash, DC, United States.
William S FisherUS Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Center for Environmental, Measurement and Modeling (CEMM), Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division (GEMMD), Gulf Breeze, FL, United States.
Randy ClarkNOAA NCCOS, Marine Spatial Ecology Division, Biogeography Branch, Stennis Space Center, MS, United States.
Hector Ruiz TorresUniversity of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, PR, United States.
Brandi ToddNOAA, Emergency Response Division, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Sandy RaimondoUS Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Office of Research and Development (ORD), Center for Environmental, Measurement and Modeling (CEMM), Gulf Ecosystem Measurement and Modeling Division (GEMMD), Gulf Breeze, FL, United States.
Environmental Protection Agency · USNational Museum of Natural History · USNOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science · USNova Southeastern University · USStennis Space Center · USTetra Tech (United States) · USUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of North Carolina Wilmington · USUniversity of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PRUniversity of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez · PR

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) is a conceptual model used to describe incremental changes in biological condition along a gradient of increasing anthropogenic stress. As coral reefs collapse globally, scientists and managers are focused on how to sustain the crucial structure and functions, and the benefits that healthy coral reef ecosystems provide for many economies and societies. We developed a numeric (quantitative) BGC model for the coral reefs of Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands to transparently facilitate ecologically meaningful management decisions regarding these fragile resources. Here, reef conditions range from natural, undisturbed conditions to severely altered or degraded conditions. Numeric decision rules were developed by an expert panel for scleractinian corals and other benthic assemblages using multiple attributes to apply in shallow-water tropical fore reefs with depths <30 m. The numeric model employed decision rules based on metrics (e.g., % live coral cover, coral species richness, pollution-sensitive coral species, unproductive and sediment substrates, % cover by Orbicella spp.) used to assess coral reef condition. Model confirmation showed the numeric BCG model predicted the panel's median site ratings for 84% of the sites used to calibrate the model and 89% of independent validation sites. The numeric BCG model is suitable for adaptive management applications and supports bioassessment and criteria development. It is a robust assessment tool that could be used to establish ecosystem condition that would aid resource managers in evaluating and communicating current or changing conditions, protect water and habitat quality in areas of high biological integrity, or develop restoration goals with stakeholders and other public beneficiaries.

Indexed as

BiocriteriaBiological Condition Gradient (BCG)Biological integrityCoral reef conditionCoral reef protectionnumeric model

Identifiers

PMID35516524
PMCPMC9067392
OpenAlexW4205819631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.