Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35516505›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2020

Quality characteristics of infusion and health consequences: a comparative study between orthodox and CTC green teas.

Himangshu Deka, Tupu Barman, Podma Pollov Sarmah, Arundhuti Devi, Pradip Tamuly, Ranjit Kumar Paul, Tanmoy Karak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Himangshu DekaBiochemistry Department, Tocklai Tea Research Institute Jorhat 785008 Assam India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2627-3552
Tupu BarmanAnalytical Services Department, Tocklai Tea Research Institute Jorhat 785008 Assam India.
Podma Pollov SarmahBiochemistry Department, Tocklai Tea Research Institute Jorhat 785008 Assam India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-7326
Arundhuti DeviResource Management and Environment Section, Institute of Advanced Study in Science and Technology Guwahati 781035 Assam India deviarundh2@yahoo.co.in +91-9401081308.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-7510
Pradip TamulyBiochemistry Department, Tocklai Tea Research Institute Jorhat 785008 Assam India.
Ranjit Kumar PaulICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute New Delhi 110012 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-8504
Tanmoy KarakUpper Assam Advisory Centre, Tea Research Association Dikom 786101 Assam India tanmay.karak@gmail.com t.karak@tocklai.net +91-9435861567.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-2529
Tea Research Association · INAdvisory Board Company (United States) · USAnalytical Services · USIndian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute · INIndian Institute of Technology Guwahati · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study compares the effects of two green tea processing techniques,

Identifiers

PMID35516505
PMCPMC9056637
OpenAlexW3082695157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.